ChallengerModel A
Challenger 65C
Crawler
- power
- 285 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Crawler
Challenger 65C vs Massey Ferguson 5200
Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 5200
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 375 hp
- displacement
- 855 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 12
ChallengerChallenger 65C
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 5200
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Crawler
Engine Power
▲ 5200 higher · +90 hp (+32%)65C285 hp
5200375 hp
Median Crawler Tractor200 hp
65C is in the 64th percentile; 5200 is in the 74th · 142 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 5200 higher · +217 ci (+34%)65C638 ci
5200855 ci
Median Crawler Tractor468 ci
65C is in the 70th percentile; 5200 is in the 88th · 191 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied65C6
52006
Median Crawler Tractor6
65C is in the 50th percentile; 5200 is in the 50th · 192 models
Forward Gears
▲ 5200 higher · +2 (+20%)65C10
520012
Median Crawler Tractor10
65C is in the 50th percentile; 5200 is in the 54th · 179 models
65C (A)5200 (B)Median Crawler Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Massey Ferguson 5200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | 65C | 5200 | — |
| Category | Crawler | Four-Wheel Drive | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Massey Ferguson 5200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Cummins | — |
| Model | 3306 DITA | Cummins NTA855 | — |
| Power Output | 285hp | 375hp | ▲ 5200+90 hp · +32% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 638ci | 855ci | ▲ 5200+217 ci · +34% |
| Bore | 4.8in | 5.5in | ▲ 5200+0.7 in · +15% |
| Stroke | 6in | 6in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Massey Ferguson 5200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Full power shift | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Massey Ferguson 5200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 232in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 120in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 128in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 32,875lb | 36,000lb | ▲ 5200+3,125 lb · +10% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Massey Ferguson 5200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Articulated power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Massey Ferguson 5200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | III | — |
| Hitch Category | III/IV | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 11,000lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Massey Ferguson 5200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 articulated 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Articulated power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Massey Ferguson 5200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Massey Ferguson 5200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 11gal | 15.7gal | ▲ 5200+4.7 gal · +43% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger 65C | Massey Ferguson 5200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 200 hpA · 64th percentile (285 hp)B · 74th percentile (375 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 468 ciA · 70th percentile (638 ci)B · 88th percentile (855 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 10A · 50th percentile (10)B · 54th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 23,320 lbA · 68th percentile (32,875 lb)B · 77th percentile (36,000 lb)
A · 65CB · 5200Median Crawler Tractor