ChallengerModel A
Challenger 70C
Tractor
- power
- 285 hp
- displacement
- 638 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Crawler
Challenger 70C vs John Deere 9300T
John DeereModel B
John Deere 9300T
Crawler
- power
- 303 hp
- displacement
- 765 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 24
ChallengerChallenger 70C
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 9300T
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Crawler
Engine Power
▲ 9300T higher · +18 hp (+6%)70C285 hp
9300T303 hp
Median Crawler Tractor200 hp
70C is in the 64th percentile; 9300T is in the 65th · 142 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 9300T higher · +127 ci (+20%)70C638 ci
9300T765 ci
Median Crawler Tractor468 ci
70C is in the 70th percentile; 9300T is in the 78th · 191 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied70C6
9300T6
Median Crawler Tractor6
70C is in the 50th percentile; 9300T is in the 50th · 192 models
Forward Gears
▲ 9300T higher · +14 (+140%)70C10
9300T24
Median Crawler Tractor10
70C is in the 50th percentile; 9300T is in the 94th · 179 models
70C (A)9300T (B)Median Crawler Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 70C | John Deere 9300T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | John Deere | — |
| Model | 70C | 9300T | — |
| Category | Not recorded | Crawler | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 70C | John Deere 9300T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | John Deere | — |
| Model | 3306 DITA | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 285hp | 303hp | ▲ 9300T+18 hp · +6% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,101RPM | ▲ 9300T+1 RPM · <1% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 638ci | 765ci | ▲ 9300T+127 ci · +20% |
| Bore | 4.8in | 5in | ▲ 9300T+0.2 in · +4% |
| Stroke | 6in | 6.5in | ▲ 9300T+0.5 in · +8% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 70C | John Deere 9300T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 70C | John Deere 9300T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 232in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 120in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 128in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 35,685lb | 42,090lb | ▲ 9300T+6,405 lb · +18% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 70C | John Deere 9300T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Electro-hydraulic | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Challenger 70C | John Deere 9300T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 1000 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 70C | John Deere 9300T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category III and IV | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 70C | John Deere 9300T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | Tracked | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | Track | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Electro-hydraulic | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 70C | John Deere 9300T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 70C | John Deere 9300T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 15gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger 70C | John Deere 9300T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 200 hpA · 64th percentile (285 hp)B · 65th percentile (303 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 468 ciA · 70th percentile (638 ci)B · 78th percentile (765 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 10A · 50th percentile (10)B · 94th percentile (24)
Operating Weight
median 23,320 lbA · 76th percentile (35,685 lb)B · 81st percentile (42,090 lb)
A · 70CB · 9300TMedian Crawler Tractor