ChallengerModel A
Challenger 75C
Articulated
- power
- 325 hp
- displacement
- 629 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Articulated
Challenger 75C vs Challenger MT735
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT735
Articulated
- power
- 235 hp
- displacement
- 537 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
ChallengerChallenger 75C
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT735
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Articulated
Engine Power
▲ 75C higher · +90 hp (+38%)75C325 hp
MT735235 hp
Median Articulated Tractor450 hp
75C is in the 13th percentile; MT735 is in the 2nd · 62 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 75C higher · +92 ci (+17%)75C629 ci
MT735537 ci
Median Articulated Tractor827 ci
75C is in the 13th percentile; MT735 is in the 1st · 61 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied75C6
MT7356
Median Articulated Tractor6
75C is in the 50th percentile; MT735 is in the 50th · 61 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT735 higher · +6 (+60%)75C10
MT73516
Median Articulated Tractor16
75C is in the 3rd percentile; MT735 is in the 50th · 59 models
75C (A)MT735 (B)Median Articulated Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 75C | Challenger MT735 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | 75C | MT735 | — |
| Category | Articulated | Articulated | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 75C | Challenger MT735 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Caterpillar | Same |
| Model | 3176 ATAAC | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 325hp | 235hp | ▲ 75C+90 hp · +38% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 629ci | 537ci | ▲ 75C+92 ci · +17% |
| Bore | 4.9in | 4.4in | ▲ 75C+0.5 in · +11% |
| Stroke | 5.5in | 5.9in | ▲ MT735+0.4 in · +7% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 75C | Challenger MT735 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | Full power shift | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 75C | Challenger MT735 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 232in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 120in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 144in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 33,305lb | 28,185lb | ▲ 75C+5,120 lb · +18% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 75C | Challenger MT735 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Electro-hydraulic | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Challenger 75C | Challenger MT735 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Rear 1000 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 75C | Challenger MT735 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | III | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 75C | Challenger MT735 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydraulic | Electro-hydraulic | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Hydraulic wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 75C | Challenger MT735 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 75C | Challenger MT735 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 15gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger 75C | Challenger MT735 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 450 hpA · 13th percentile (325 hp)B · 2nd percentile (235 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 827 ciA · 13th percentile (629 ci)B · 1st percentile (537 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 3rd percentile (10)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 51,335 lbA · 8th percentile (33,305 lb)B · 2nd percentile (28,185 lb)
A · 75CB · MT735Median Articulated Tractor