ChallengerModel A
Challenger 75E
Agricultural
- power
- 340 hp
- displacement
- 629 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger 75E vs Challenger MT595B
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT595B
Agricultural
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 449 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger 75E
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT595B
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Displacement
▲ 75E higher · +180 ci (+40%)75E629 ci
MT595B449 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
75E is in the 93rd percentile; MT595B is in the 80th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied75E6
MT595B6
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
75E is in the 74th percentile; MT595B is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ 75E higher · +17,115 lb (+97%)75E34,800 lb
MT595B17,685 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
75E is in the 97th percentile; MT595B is in the 78th · 971 models
Width
▲ MT595B higher · +93 in (+372%)75E25 in
MT595B118 in
Median Agricultural Tractor79.5 in
75E is in the 1st percentile; MT595B is in the 96th · 497 models
75E (A)MT595B (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 75E | Challenger MT595B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | 75E | MT595B | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 75E | Challenger MT595B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Sisu Diesel | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 74CTA | — |
| Power Output | 340hp | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 629ci | 449ci | ▲ 75E+180 ci · +40% |
| Bore | 4.9in | 4.3in | ▲ 75E+0.6 in · +14% |
| Stroke | 5.5in | 5.3in | ▲ 75E+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 75E | Challenger MT595B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | Continuously variable transmission | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 75E | Challenger MT595B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 200in | — |
| Width | 25in | 118in | ▲ MT595B+93 in · +372% |
| Height | Not recorded | 122in | — |
| Operating Weight | 34,800lb | 17,685lb | ▲ 75E+17,115 lb · +97% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 75E | Challenger MT595B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed | Closed center pressure flow compensated | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Differential Steering | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 75E | Challenger MT595B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III, IV | Category III | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 75E | Challenger MT595B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Differential Steering | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 75E | Challenger MT595B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 75E | Challenger MT595B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 15gal | 9gal | ▲ 75E+6 gal · +67% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger 75E | Challenger MT595B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 93rd percentile (629 ci)B · 80th percentile (449 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 97th percentile (34,800 lb)B · 78th percentile (17,685 lb)
Width
median 79.5 inA · 1st percentile (25 in)B · 96th percentile (118 in)
A · 75EB · MT595BMedian Agricultural Tractor