Head to head · Agricultural

Challenger 75E vs Challenger MT765C

Challenger 75E Tractor
ChallengerModel A

Challenger 75E

Agricultural

power
340 hp
displacement
629 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
10
Full 75E specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT765C

Crawler

power
321 hp
displacement
537 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full MT765C specs
ChallengerChallenger 75E
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT765C

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural

n = 4971,130

Engine Power

▲ 75E higher · +19 hp (+6%)
75E340 hp
MT765C321 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp

75E is in the 96th percentile; MT765C is in the 95th · 1,028 models

Engine Displacement

▲ 75E higher · +92 ci (+17%)
75E629 ci
MT765C537 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci

75E is in the 93rd percentile; MT765C is in the 89th · 1,083 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
75E6
MT765C6
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5

75E is in the 74th percentile; MT765C is in the 74th · 1,130 models

Forward Gears

▲ MT765C higher · +6 (+60%)
75E10
MT765C16
Median Agricultural Tractor16

75E is in the 23rd percentile; MT765C is in the 50th · 972 models

75E (A)MT765C (B)Median Agricultural Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger 75EChallenger MT765CDifference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
Model75EMT765C
CategoryAgriculturalCrawler, Agricultural

Engine

SpecChallenger 75EChallenger MT765CDifference
ManufacturerCaterpillarCaterpillarSame
ModelNot recordedC9 ACERT
Power Output340hp321hp75E+19 hp · +6%
Rated RPM2,100RPM2,100RPMSame
Cylinders66Same
Displacement629ci537ci75E+92 ci · +17%
Bore4.9in4.4in75E+0.5 in · +11%
Stroke5.5in5.9inMT765C+0.4 in · +7%

Transmission

SpecChallenger 75EChallenger MT765CDifference
TypeFull Power Shift16-Speed Full Power Shift

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger 75EChallenger MT765CDifference
LengthNot recorded233in
Width25in133inMT765C+108 in · +432%
HeightNot recorded136in
Operating Weight34,800lb31,085lb75E+3,715 lb · +12%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger 75EChallenger MT765CDifference
System TypeClosedClosed center pressure-flow compensated
Steering TypeHydrostatic Differential SteeringElectro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheel

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger 75EChallenger MT765CDifference
Hitch CategoryIII, IVCategory III/IIIN
Hitch PositionRearNot recorded

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger 75EChallenger MT765CDifference
Chassis TypeNot recordedCrawler
Steering TypeHydrostatic Differential SteeringElectro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheel
Brake TypeNot recordedHydraulic Wet Disc

Electrical

SpecChallenger 75EChallenger MT765CDifference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Capacities

SpecChallenger 75EChallenger MT765CDifference
Coolant15galNot recorded

Operator Station

SpecChallenger 75EChallenger MT765CDifference
TypeNot recordedCab

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 110 hp
A · 96th percentile (340 hp)B · 95th percentile (321 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 336 ci
A · 93rd percentile (629 ci)B · 89th percentile (537 ci)

Cylinders

median 5.5
A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 23rd percentile (10)B · 50th percentile (16)

Operating Weight

median 10,914 lb
A · 97th percentile (34,800 lb)B · 95th percentile (31,085 lb)
A · 75EB · MT765CMedian Agricultural Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger 75EFull spec pageChallenger MT765C