ChallengerModel A
Challenger 85C
Crawler
- power
- 355 hp
- displacement
- 629 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Crawler
Challenger 85C vs Steyr 1100
ChallengerChallenger 85C
vs
SteyrSteyr 1100
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Crawler
Engine Power
▲ 85C higher · +255 hp (+255%)85C355 hp
1100100 hp
Median Crawler Tractor200 hp
85C is in the 72nd percentile; 1100 is in the 45th · 142 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 85C higher · +264 ci (+72%)85C629 ci
1100365 ci
Median Crawler Tractor468 ci
85C is in the 67th percentile; 1100 is in the 44th · 191 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied85C6
11006
Median Crawler Tractor6
85C is in the 50th percentile; 1100 is in the 50th · 192 models
Forward Gears
▲ 1100 higher · +2 (+20%)85C10
110012
Median Crawler Tractor10
85C is in the 50th percentile; 1100 is in the 54th · 179 models
85C (A)1100 (B)Median Crawler Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 85C | Steyr 1100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Steyr | — |
| Model | 85C | 1100 | — |
| Category | Crawler | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 85C | Steyr 1100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Steyr | — |
| Model | 3176 ATAAC | WD 610.40 | — |
| Power Output | 355hp | 100hp | ▲ 85C+255 hp · +255% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 629ci | 365ci | ▲ 85C+264 ci · +72% |
| Bore | 4.9in | 4.1in | ▲ 85C+0.8 in · +20% |
| Stroke | 5.5in | 4.5in | ▲ 85C+1 in · +22% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 85C | Steyr 1100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Synchro | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 85C | Steyr 1100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 232in | 170in | ▲ 85C+62 in · +36% |
| Width | 120in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 128in | 98in | ▲ 85C+30 in · +31% |
| Operating Weight | 33,645lb | 9,437lb | ▲ 85C+24,208 lb · +257% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 85C | Steyr 1100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 85C | Steyr 1100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 3 | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 85C | Steyr 1100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 85C | Steyr 1100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 85C | Steyr 1100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 20gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 200 hpA · 72nd percentile (355 hp)B · 45th percentile (100 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 468 ciA · 67th percentile (629 ci)B · 44th percentile (365 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 10A · 50th percentile (10)B · 54th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 23,320 lbA · 70th percentile (33,645 lb)B · 31st percentile (9,437 lb)
A · 85CB · 1100Median Crawler Tractor