ChallengerModel A
Challenger 75E
Agricultural
- power
- 340 hp
- displacement
- 629 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger 75E vs Challenger 85C
ChallengerModel B
Challenger 85C
Crawler
- power
- 355 hp
- displacement
- 629 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
ChallengerChallenger 75E
vs
ChallengerChallenger 85C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ 85C higher · +15 hp (+4%)75E340 hp
85C355 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
75E is in the 96th percentile; 85C is in the 96th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tied75E629 ci
85C629 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
75E is in the 93rd percentile; 85C is in the 93rd · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied75E6
85C6
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
75E is in the 74th percentile; 85C is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tied75E10
85C10
Median Agricultural Tractor16
75E is in the 23rd percentile; 85C is in the 23rd · 972 models
75E (A)85C (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger 75E | Challenger 85C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | 75E | 85C | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Crawler | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger 75E | Challenger 85C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Caterpillar | Same |
| Model | Not recorded | 3176 ATAAC | — |
| Power Output | 340hp | 355hp | ▲ 85C+15 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 629ci | 629ci | Same |
| Bore | 4.9in | 4.9in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.5in | 5.5in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger 75E | Challenger 85C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | Full power shift | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger 75E | Challenger 85C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 232in | — |
| Width | 25in | 120in | ▲ 85C+95 in · +380% |
| Height | Not recorded | 128in | — |
| Operating Weight | 34,800lb | 33,645lb | ▲ 75E+1,155 lb · +3% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger 75E | Challenger 85C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed | Closed center | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Differential Steering | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger 75E | Challenger 85C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III, IV | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger 75E | Challenger 85C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Differential Steering | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger 75E | Challenger 85C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger 75E | Challenger 85C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 15gal | 20gal | ▲ 85C+5 gal · +33% |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 96th percentile (340 hp)B · 96th percentile (355 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 93rd percentile (629 ci)B · 93rd percentile (629 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 23rd percentile (10)B · 23rd percentile (10)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 97th percentile (34,800 lb)B · 96th percentile (33,645 lb)
A · 75EB · 85CMedian Agricultural Tractor