Head to head · Utility

Challenger MT225 vs Challenger MT255B

Challenger MT225 Tractor
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT225

Utility

power
23.3 hp
displacement
68.5 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full MT225 specs
Challenger MT255B Tractor
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT255B

Utility

power
28.4 hp
displacement
89.3 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full MT255B specs
ChallengerChallenger MT225
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT255B

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 1,083–5,720

Engine Power

▲ MT255B higher · +5.1 hp (+22%)
MT22523.3 hp
MT255B28.4 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp

MT225 is in the 13th percentile; MT255B is in the 20th · 5,383 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT255B higher · +20.8 ci (+30%)
MT22568.5 ci
MT255B89.3 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

MT225 is in the 8th percentile; MT255B is in the 15th · 5,580 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
MT2253
MT255B3
Median Utility Tractor4

MT225 is in the 23rd percentile; MT255B is in the 23rd · 5,720 models

Operating Weight

▲ MT255B higher · +751 lb (+45%)
MT2251,672 lb
MT255B2,423 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb

MT225 is in the 8th percentile; MT255B is in the 15th · 5,107 models

MT225 (A)MT255B (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT225Challenger MT255BDifference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
ModelMT225MT255B—
CategoryUtilityUtilitySame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT225Challenger MT255BDifference
ManufacturerIsekiIsekiSame
ModelNot recordedE3CF—
Power Output23.3hp28.4hp▲ MT255B+5.1 hp · +22%
Rated RPM2,800RPM2,500RPM▲ MT225+300 RPM · +12%
Cylinders33Same
Displacement68.5ci89.3ci▲ MT255B+20.8 ci · +30%
Bore3.1in3.4in▲ MT255B+0.3 in · +10%
Stroke3.1in3.3in▲ MT255B+0.2 in · +6%

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT225Challenger MT255BDifference
TypeHydrostaticHydrostaticSame

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT225Challenger MT255BDifference
Length105in112in▲ MT255B+7 in · +7%
Width41in50.6in▲ MT255B+9.6 in · +23%
Height75.2in80.7in▲ MT255B+5.5 in · +7%
Operating Weight1,672lb2,423lb▲ MT255B+751 lb · +45%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT225Challenger MT255BDifference
System TypeOpen CenterOpen CenterSame
Steering TypePower steeringPower—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT225Challenger MT255BDifference
Hitch TypeCategory I3 Point Hitch—
Hitch Category1I—
Hitch PositionRearNot recorded—
Hitch Capacity694lb1,609lb▲ MT255B+915 lb · +132%

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT225Challenger MT255BDifference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WD4x4 MFWD 4WDSame
Drive Type4WD4WDSame
Steering TypePower steeringPower—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT225Challenger MT255BDifference
Starter TypeElectric StarterElectric—

Capacities

SpecChallenger MT225Challenger MT255BDifference
CoolantNot recorded1.5gal—

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT225Challenger MT255BDifference
TypeOpenOpenSame

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 55 hp
A · 13th percentile (23.3 hp)B · 20th percentile (28.4 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 8th percentile (68.5 ci)B · 15th percentile (89.3 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)

Operating Weight

median 5,303 lb
A · 8th percentile (1,672 lb)B · 15th percentile (2,423 lb)

Length

median 137 in
A · 12th percentile (105 in)B · 18th percentile (112 in)
A · MT225B · MT255BMedian Utility Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT225Full spec pageChallenger MT255B