Head to head · Utility

Challenger MT225 vs Challenger MT265B

Challenger MT225 Tractor
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT225

Utility

power
23.3 hp
displacement
68.5 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full MT225 specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT265B

Utility

power
33 hp
displacement
91.4 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
8
Full MT265B specs
ChallengerChallenger MT225
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT265B

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 1,083–5,720

Engine Power

▲ MT265B higher · +9.7 hp (+42%)
MT22523.3 hp
MT265B33 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp

MT225 is in the 13th percentile; MT265B is in the 25th · 5,383 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT265B higher · +22.9 ci (+33%)
MT22568.5 ci
MT265B91.4 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

MT225 is in the 8th percentile; MT265B is in the 18th · 5,580 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
MT2253
MT265B3
Median Utility Tractor4

MT225 is in the 23rd percentile; MT265B is in the 23rd · 5,720 models

Operating Weight

▲ MT265B higher · +1,464 lb (+88%)
MT2251,672 lb
MT265B3,136 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb

MT225 is in the 8th percentile; MT265B is in the 25th · 5,107 models

MT225 (A)MT265B (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT225Challenger MT265BDifference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
ModelMT225MT265B—
CategoryUtilityUtilitySame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT225Challenger MT265BDifference
ManufacturerIsekiIsekiSame
ModelNot recordedE3CD-VB40—
Power Output23.3hp33hp▲ MT265B+9.7 hp · +42%
Rated RPM2,800RPM2,600RPM▲ MT225+200 RPM · +8%
Cylinders33Same
Displacement68.5ci91.4ci▲ MT265B+22.9 ci · +33%
Bore3.1in3.4in▲ MT265B+0.3 in · +10%
Stroke3.1in3.3in▲ MT265B+0.2 in · +6%

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT225Challenger MT265BDifference
TypeHydrostaticSynchroShuttle—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT225Challenger MT265BDifference
Length105in121in▲ MT265B+16 in · +15%
Width41in62.2in▲ MT265B+21.2 in · +52%
Height75.2in87.4in▲ MT265B+12.2 in · +16%
Operating Weight1,672lb3,136lb▲ MT265B+1,464 lb · +88%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT225Challenger MT265BDifference
System TypeOpen CenterOpen CenterSame
Steering TypePower steeringPower—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT225Challenger MT265BDifference
Hitch TypeCategory ICategory ISame
Hitch Category11Same
Hitch PositionRearRearSame
Hitch Capacity694lb2,535lb▲ MT265B+1,841 lb · +265%

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT225Challenger MT265BDifference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WD4x4 MFWD 4WDSame
Drive Type4WDFour Wheel Drive (4WD)—
Steering TypePower steeringPower—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT225Challenger MT265BDifference
Starter TypeElectric StarterElectric—

Capacities

SpecChallenger MT225Challenger MT265BDifference
CoolantNot recorded1.8gal—

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT225Challenger MT265BDifference
TypeOpenOpenSame

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 55 hp
A · 13th percentile (23.3 hp)B · 25th percentile (33 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 8th percentile (68.5 ci)B · 18th percentile (91.4 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)

Operating Weight

median 5,303 lb
A · 8th percentile (1,672 lb)B · 25th percentile (3,136 lb)

Length

median 137 in
A · 12th percentile (105 in)B · 28th percentile (121 in)
A · MT225B · MT265BMedian Utility Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT225Full spec pageChallenger MT265B