Head to head · Utility

Challenger MT225B vs Challenger MT255

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT225B

Utility

power
22.5 hp
displacement
68.5 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full MT225B specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT255

Utility

power
28.4 hp
displacement
89.3 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
9
Full MT255 specs
ChallengerChallenger MT225B
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT255

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 1,083–5,720

Engine Power

▲ MT255 higher · +5.9 hp (+26%)
MT225B22.5 hp
MT25528.4 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp

MT225B is in the 12th percentile; MT255 is in the 20th · 5,383 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT255 higher · +20.8 ci (+30%)
MT225B68.5 ci
MT25589.3 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

MT225B is in the 8th percentile; MT255 is in the 15th · 5,580 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
MT225B3
MT2553
Median Utility Tractor4

MT225B is in the 23rd percentile; MT255 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models

Operating Weight

▲ MT255 higher · +639 lb (+40%)
MT225B1,609 lb
MT2552,248 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb

MT225B is in the 7th percentile; MT255 is in the 14th · 5,107 models

MT225B (A)MT255 (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT225BChallenger MT255Difference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
ModelMT225BMT255—
CategoryUtilityUtilitySame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT225BChallenger MT255Difference
ManufacturerIsekiIsekiSame
ModelE3312Not recorded—
Power Output22.5hp28.4hp▲ MT255+5.9 hp · +26%
Rated RPM2,600RPM2,500RPM▲ MT225B+100 RPM · +4%
Cylinders33Same
Displacement68.5ci89.3ci▲ MT255+20.8 ci · +30%
Bore3.1in3.4in▲ MT255+0.3 in · +10%
Stroke3.1in3.3in▲ MT255+0.2 in · +6%

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT225BChallenger MT255Difference
TypeHydrostaticConstant mesh—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT225BChallenger MT255Difference
Length102in117in▲ MT255+15 in · +15%
Width39.4in51in▲ MT255+11.6 in · +29%
Height65.5in79.3in▲ MT255+13.8 in · +21%
Operating Weight1,609lb2,248lb▲ MT255+639 lb · +40%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT225BChallenger MT255Difference
System TypeOpen CenterOpen CenterSame
Steering TypeHydrostatic PowerPower—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT225BChallenger MT255Difference
Hitch TypeThree-Point HitchCAT I—
Hitch CategoryIISame
Hitch PositionNot recordedRear—
Hitch Capacity591lb1,323lb▲ MT255+732 lb · +124%

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT225BChallenger MT255Difference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WD4x4 MFWD 4WDSame
Drive Type4WD4WDSame
Steering TypeHydrostatic PowerPower—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT225BChallenger MT255Difference
Starter TypeNot recordedElectric—

Capacities

SpecChallenger MT225BChallenger MT255Difference
Coolant1.9galNot recorded—

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT225BChallenger MT255Difference
TypeNot recordedOpen, ROPS—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 55 hp
A · 12th percentile (22.5 hp)B · 20th percentile (28.4 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 8th percentile (68.5 ci)B · 15th percentile (89.3 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)

Operating Weight

median 5,303 lb
A · 7th percentile (1,609 lb)B · 14th percentile (2,248 lb)

Length

median 137 in
A · 10th percentile (102 in)B · 23rd percentile (117 in)
A · MT225BB · MT255Median Utility Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT225BFull spec pageChallenger MT255