Head to head · Utility

Challenger MT225B vs Challenger MT265

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT225B

Utility

power
22.5 hp
displacement
68.5 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full MT225B specs
Challenger MT265 Tractor
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT265

Utility

power
33 hp
displacement
91.4 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
16
Full MT265 specs
ChallengerChallenger MT225B
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT265

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 1,083–5,720

Engine Power

▲ MT265 higher · +10.5 hp (+47%)
MT225B22.5 hp
MT26533 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp

MT225B is in the 12th percentile; MT265 is in the 25th · 5,383 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT265 higher · +22.9 ci (+33%)
MT225B68.5 ci
MT26591.4 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

MT225B is in the 8th percentile; MT265 is in the 18th · 5,580 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
MT225B3
MT2653
Median Utility Tractor4

MT225B is in the 23rd percentile; MT265 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models

Operating Weight

▲ MT265 higher · +1,432 lb (+89%)
MT225B1,609 lb
MT2653,041 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb

MT225B is in the 7th percentile; MT265 is in the 23rd · 5,107 models

MT225B (A)MT265 (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT225BChallenger MT265Difference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
ModelMT225BMT265—
CategoryUtilityUtilitySame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT225BChallenger MT265Difference
ManufacturerIsekiIsekiSame
ModelE3312Not recorded—
Power Output22.5hp33hp▲ MT265+10.5 hp · +47%
Rated RPM2,600RPM2,600RPMSame
Cylinders33Same
Displacement68.5ci91.4ci▲ MT265+22.9 ci · +33%
Bore3.1in3.4in▲ MT265+0.3 in · +10%
Stroke3.1in3.3in▲ MT265+0.2 in · +6%

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT225BChallenger MT265Difference
TypeHydrostaticPower shuttle—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT225BChallenger MT265Difference
Length102in122in▲ MT265+20 in · +20%
Width39.4in60.6in▲ MT265+21.2 in · +54%
Height65.5in93.2in▲ MT265+27.7 in · +42%
Operating Weight1,609lb3,041lb▲ MT265+1,432 lb · +89%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT225BChallenger MT265Difference
System TypeOpen CenterOpen centerSame
Steering TypeHydrostatic PowerPower—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT225BChallenger MT265Difference
Hitch TypeThree-Point HitchCategory I—
Hitch CategoryINot recorded—
Hitch PositionNot recordedRear—
Hitch Capacity591lb2,100lb▲ MT265+1,509 lb · +255%

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT225BChallenger MT265Difference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WD4x4 MFWD 4WDSame
Drive Type4WD4WDSame
Steering TypeHydrostatic PowerPower—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT225BChallenger MT265Difference
Starter TypeNot recordedElectric—

Capacities

SpecChallenger MT225BChallenger MT265Difference
Coolant1.9galNot recorded—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 55 hp
A · 12th percentile (22.5 hp)B · 25th percentile (33 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 8th percentile (68.5 ci)B · 18th percentile (91.4 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)

Operating Weight

median 5,303 lb
A · 7th percentile (1,609 lb)B · 23rd percentile (3,041 lb)

Length

median 137 in
A · 10th percentile (102 in)B · 29th percentile (122 in)
A · MT225BB · MT265Median Utility Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT225BFull spec pageChallenger MT265