Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT255
Utility
- power
- 28.4 hp
- displacement
- 89.3 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 9
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT255 vs Challenger MT445
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT445
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 258 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 24
ChallengerChallenger MT255
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT445
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ MT445 higher · +169 ci (+189%)MT25589.3 ci
MT445258 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT255 is in the 15th percentile; MT445 is in the 73rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ MT445 higher · +1 (+33%)MT2553
MT4454
Median Utility Tractor4
MT255 is in the 23rd percentile; MT445 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT445 higher · +15 (+167%)MT2559
MT44524
Median Utility Tractor12
MT255 is in the 35th percentile; MT445 is in the 92nd · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT445 higher · +3,963 lb (+176%)MT2552,248 lb
MT4456,211 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
MT255 is in the 14th percentile; MT445 is in the 59th · 5,107 models
MT255 (A)MT445 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT255 | Challenger MT445 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | MT255 | MT445 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT255 | Challenger MT445 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iseki | Perkins | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 3054B | — |
| Power Output | 28.4hp | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ MT255+300 RPM · +14% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ MT445+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 89.3ci | 258ci | ▲ MT445+169 ci · +189% |
| Bore | 3.4in | 4.1in | ▲ MT445+0.7 in · +21% |
| Stroke | 3.3in | 5in | ▲ MT445+1.7 in · +52% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT255 | Challenger MT445 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Constant mesh | Power Shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT255 | Challenger MT445 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 117in | 163in | ▲ MT445+46 in · +39% |
| Width | 51in | 77in | ▲ MT445+26 in · +51% |
| Height | 79.3in | 103in | ▲ MT445+23.7 in · +30% |
| Operating Weight | 2,248lb | 6,211lb | ▲ MT445+3,963 lb · +176% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT255 | Challenger MT445 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open Center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Tread Width
| Spec | Challenger MT255 | Challenger MT445 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tread Width | Not recorded | 12.4in | — |
| Rear Tread | Not recorded | 13.6in | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT255 | Challenger MT445 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | CAT I | Category 2 | — |
| Hitch Category | I | Category 2 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 1,323lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT255 | Challenger MT445 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Wet Disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT255 | Challenger MT445 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric Starter | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT255 | Challenger MT445 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open, ROPS | Open (ROPS) | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 15th percentile (89.3 ci)B · 73rd percentile (258 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 35th percentile (9)B · 92nd percentile (24)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 14th percentile (2,248 lb)B · 59th percentile (6,211 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 23rd percentile (117 in)B · 81st percentile (163 in)
A · MT255B · MT445Median Utility Tractor