Head to head · Utility

Challenger MT255 vs Challenger MT465

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT255

Utility

power
28.4 hp
displacement
89.3 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
9
Full MT255 specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT465

Utility

power
Not recorded
displacement
243 ci
Cylinders
4
Forward gears
24
Full MT465 specs
ChallengerChallenger MT255
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT465

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 3,933–5,720

Engine Displacement

▲ MT465 higher · +154 ci (+172%)
MT25589.3 ci
MT465243 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

MT255 is in the 15th percentile; MT465 is in the 67th · 5,580 models

Cylinders

▲ MT465 higher · +1 (+33%)
MT2553
MT4654
Median Utility Tractor4

MT255 is in the 23rd percentile; MT465 is in the 50th · 5,720 models

Forward Gears

▲ MT465 higher · +15 (+167%)
MT2559
MT46524
Median Utility Tractor12

MT255 is in the 35th percentile; MT465 is in the 92nd · 4,941 models

Operating Weight

▲ MT465 higher · +4,666 lb (+208%)
MT2552,248 lb
MT4656,914 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb

MT255 is in the 14th percentile; MT465 is in the 66th · 5,107 models

MT255 (A)MT465 (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT255Challenger MT465Difference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
ModelMT255MT465—
CategoryUtilityUtilitySame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT255Challenger MT465Difference
ManufacturerIsekiPerkins—
ModelNot recorded3054 DITA—
Power Output28.4hpNot recorded—
Rated RPM2,500RPM2,200RPM▲ MT255+300 RPM · +14%
Cylinders34▲ MT465+1 · +33%
Displacement89.3ci243ci▲ MT465+154 ci · +172%
Bore3.4in3.9in▲ MT465+0.5 in · +15%
Stroke3.3in5in▲ MT465+1.7 in · +52%

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT255Challenger MT465Difference
TypeConstant meshPower Shuttle—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT255Challenger MT465Difference
Length117in164in▲ MT465+47 in · +40%
Width51in77in▲ MT465+26 in · +51%
Height79.3in103in▲ MT465+23.7 in · +30%
Operating Weight2,248lb6,914lb▲ MT465+4,666 lb · +208%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT255Challenger MT465Difference
System TypeOpen CenterOpen centerSame
Steering TypePowerPowerSame

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT255Challenger MT465Difference
Hitch TypeCAT INot recorded—
Hitch CategoryIII—
Hitch PositionRearRearSame
Hitch Capacity1,323lbNot recorded—

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT255Challenger MT465Difference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WD4x2 2WD—
Drive Type4WD2WD—
Steering TypePowerPowerSame

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT255Challenger MT465Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT255Challenger MT465Difference
TypeOpen, ROPSNot recorded—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 15th percentile (89.3 ci)B · 67th percentile (243 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)

Forward Gears

median 12
A · 35th percentile (9)B · 92nd percentile (24)

Operating Weight

median 5,303 lb
A · 14th percentile (2,248 lb)B · 66th percentile (6,914 lb)

Length

median 137 in
A · 23rd percentile (117 in)B · 82nd percentile (164 in)
A · MT255B · MT465Median Utility Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT255Full spec pageChallenger MT465