ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT255B
Utility
- power
- 28.4 hp
- displacement
- 89.3 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT255B vs Challenger MT265B
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT265B
Utility
- power
- 33 hp
- displacement
- 91.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 8
ChallengerChallenger MT255B
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT265B
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ MT265B higher · +4.6 hp (+16%)MT255B28.4 hp
MT265B33 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT255B is in the 20th percentile; MT265B is in the 25th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT265B higher · +2.1 ci (+2%)MT255B89.3 ci
MT265B91.4 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT255B is in the 15th percentile; MT265B is in the 18th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT255B3
MT265B3
Median Utility Tractor4
MT255B is in the 23rd percentile; MT265B is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT265B higher · +713 lb (+29%)MT255B2,423 lb
MT265B3,136 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
MT255B is in the 15th percentile; MT265B is in the 25th · 5,107 models
MT255B (A)MT265B (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT255B | Challenger MT265B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | MT255B | MT265B | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT255B | Challenger MT265B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iseki | Iseki | Same |
| Model | E3CF | E3CD-VB40 | — |
| Power Output | 28.4hp | 33hp | ▲ MT265B+4.6 hp · +16% |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,600RPM | ▲ MT265B+100 RPM · +4% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 89.3ci | 91.4ci | ▲ MT265B+2.1 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 3.4in | 3.4in | Same |
| Stroke | 3.3in | 3.3in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT255B | Challenger MT265B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic | SynchroShuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT255B | Challenger MT265B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 112in | 121in | ▲ MT265B+9 in · +8% |
| Width | 50.6in | 62.2in | ▲ MT265B+11.6 in · +23% |
| Height | 80.7in | 87.4in | ▲ MT265B+6.7 in · +8% |
| Operating Weight | 2,423lb | 3,136lb | ▲ MT265B+713 lb · +29% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT255B | Challenger MT265B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Open Center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT255B | Challenger MT265B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | 3 Point Hitch | Category I | — |
| Hitch Category | I | 1 | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 1,609lb | 2,535lb | ▲ MT265B+926 lb · +58% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT255B | Challenger MT265B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Four Wheel Drive (4WD) | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT255B | Challenger MT265B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger MT255B | Challenger MT265B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.5gal | 1.8gal | ▲ MT265B+0.4 gal · +29% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT255B | Challenger MT265B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | Open | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 20th percentile (28.4 hp)B · 25th percentile (33 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 15th percentile (89.3 ci)B · 18th percentile (91.4 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 15th percentile (2,423 lb)B · 25th percentile (3,136 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 18th percentile (112 in)B · 28th percentile (121 in)
A · MT255BB · MT265BMedian Utility Tractor