ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT265
Utility
- power
- 33 hp
- displacement
- 91.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT265 vs Challenger MT425
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT425
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 243 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 24
ChallengerChallenger MT265
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT425
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ MT425 higher · +152 ci (+166%)MT26591.4 ci
MT425243 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT265 is in the 18th percentile; MT425 is in the 67th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ MT425 higher · +1 (+33%)MT2653
MT4254
Median Utility Tractor4
MT265 is in the 23rd percentile; MT425 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT425 higher · +8 (+50%)MT26516
MT42524
Median Utility Tractor12
MT265 is in the 73rd percentile; MT425 is in the 92nd · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT425 higher · +3,141 lb (+103%)MT2653,041 lb
MT4256,182 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
MT265 is in the 23rd percentile; MT425 is in the 58th · 5,107 models
MT265 (A)MT425 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT265 | Challenger MT425 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | MT265 | MT425 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT265 | Challenger MT425 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iseki | Perkins | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 3054 | — |
| Power Output | 33hp | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ MT265+400 RPM · +18% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ MT425+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 91.4ci | 243ci | ▲ MT425+152 ci · +166% |
| Bore | 3.4in | 3.9in | ▲ MT425+0.5 in · +15% |
| Stroke | 3.3in | 5in | ▲ MT425+1.7 in · +52% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT265 | Challenger MT425 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Power shuttle | 24-speed power shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT265 | Challenger MT425 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 122in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 60.6in | 77in | ▲ MT425+16.4 in · +27% |
| Height | 93.2in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 3,041lb | 6,182lb | ▲ MT425+3,141 lb · +103% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT265 | Challenger MT425 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT265 | Challenger MT425 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 2,100lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT265 | Challenger MT425 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT265 | Challenger MT425 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | Not recorded | 12V | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT265 | Challenger MT425 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 18th percentile (91.4 ci)B · 67th percentile (243 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 92nd percentile (24)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 23rd percentile (3,041 lb)B · 58th percentile (6,182 lb)
Width
median 66 inA · 38th percentile (60.6 in)B · 75th percentile (77 in)
A · MT265B · MT425Median Utility Tractor