ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT265
Utility
- power
- 33 hp
- displacement
- 91.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT265 vs Challenger MT445
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT445
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 258 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 24
ChallengerChallenger MT265
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT445
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ MT445 higher · +167 ci (+182%)MT26591.4 ci
MT445258 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT265 is in the 18th percentile; MT445 is in the 73rd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ MT445 higher · +1 (+33%)MT2653
MT4454
Median Utility Tractor4
MT265 is in the 23rd percentile; MT445 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT445 higher · +8 (+50%)MT26516
MT44524
Median Utility Tractor12
MT265 is in the 73rd percentile; MT445 is in the 92nd · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT445 higher · +3,170 lb (+104%)MT2653,041 lb
MT4456,211 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
MT265 is in the 23rd percentile; MT445 is in the 59th · 5,107 models
MT265 (A)MT445 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT265 | Challenger MT445 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | MT265 | MT445 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT265 | Challenger MT445 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iseki | Perkins | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 3054B | — |
| Power Output | 33hp | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ MT265+400 RPM · +18% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ MT445+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 91.4ci | 258ci | ▲ MT445+167 ci · +182% |
| Bore | 3.4in | 4.1in | ▲ MT445+0.7 in · +21% |
| Stroke | 3.3in | 5in | ▲ MT445+1.7 in · +52% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT265 | Challenger MT445 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Power shuttle | Power Shuttle | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT265 | Challenger MT445 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 122in | 163in | ▲ MT445+41 in · +34% |
| Width | 60.6in | 77in | ▲ MT445+16.4 in · +27% |
| Height | 93.2in | 103in | ▲ MT445+9.8 in · +11% |
| Operating Weight | 3,041lb | 6,211lb | ▲ MT445+3,170 lb · +104% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT265 | Challenger MT445 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open Center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Tread Width
| Spec | Challenger MT265 | Challenger MT445 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tread Width | Not recorded | 12.4in | — |
| Rear Tread | Not recorded | 13.6in | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT265 | Challenger MT445 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category I | Category 2 | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 2 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 2,100lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT265 | Challenger MT445 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x2 | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Wet Disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT265 | Challenger MT445 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric Starter | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT265 | Challenger MT445 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Open (ROPS) | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 18th percentile (91.4 ci)B · 73rd percentile (258 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 92nd percentile (24)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 23rd percentile (3,041 lb)B · 59th percentile (6,211 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 29th percentile (122 in)B · 81st percentile (163 in)
A · MT265B · MT445Median Utility Tractor