ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT265
Utility
- power
- 33 hp
- displacement
- 91.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT265 vs New Holland TC35
Image not recorded
New HollandModel B
New Holland TC35
Utility
- power
- 35 hp
- displacement
- 101 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 12
ChallengerChallenger MT265
vs
New HollandNew Holland TC35
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ TC35 higher · +2 hp (+6%)MT26533 hp
TC3535 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT265 is in the 25th percentile; TC35 is in the 28th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ TC35 higher · +9.6 ci (+11%)MT26591.4 ci
TC35101 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT265 is in the 18th percentile; TC35 is in the 24th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT2653
TC353
Median Utility Tractor4
MT265 is in the 23rd percentile; TC35 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT265 higher · +4 (+33%)MT26516
TC3512
Median Utility Tractor12
MT265 is in the 73rd percentile; TC35 is in the 50th · 4,941 models
MT265 (A)TC35 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT265 | New Holland TC35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | New Holland | — |
| Model | MT265 | TC35 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT265 | New Holland TC35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iseki | Shibaura | — |
| Model | Not recorded | N843L | — |
| Power Output | 33hp | 35hp | ▲ TC35+2 hp · +6% |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | 2,600RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 | Same |
| Displacement | 91.4ci | 101ci | ▲ TC35+9.6 ci · +11% |
| Bore | 3.4in | 3.3in | ▲ MT265+0.1 in · +3% |
| Stroke | 3.3in | 3.9in | ▲ TC35+0.6 in · +18% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT265 | New Holland TC35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Power shuttle | Synchro shuttle | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT265 | New Holland TC35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 122in | 125in | ▲ TC35+3 in · +2% |
| Width | 60.6in | 61.3in | ▲ TC35+0.7 in · +1% |
| Height | 93.2in | 95in | ▲ TC35+1.8 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 3,041lb | 3,096lb | ▲ TC35+55 lb · +2% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT265 | New Holland TC35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open center | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Challenger MT265 | New Holland TC35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Optional | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT265 | New Holland TC35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category I | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 1 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 2,100lb | 2,030lb | ▲ MT265+70 lb · +3% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT265 | New Holland TC35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Hydrostatic power | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT265 | New Holland TC35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger MT265 | New Holland TC35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 2gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT265 | New Holland TC35 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Two-post ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 25th percentile (33 hp)B · 28th percentile (35 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 18th percentile (91.4 ci)B · 24th percentile (101 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 23rd percentile (3,041 lb)B · 24th percentile (3,096 lb)
A · MT265B · TC35Median Utility Tractor