Head to head · Utility

Challenger MT265B vs Challenger MT285

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT265B

Utility

power
33 hp
displacement
91.4 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
8
Full MT265B specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT285

Utility

power
40.1 hp
displacement
91.4 ci
Cylinders
3
Forward gears
16
Full MT285 specs
ChallengerChallenger MT265B
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT285

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 1,083–5,720

Engine Power

▲ MT285 higher · +7.1 hp (+22%)
MT265B33 hp
MT28540.1 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp

MT265B is in the 25th percentile; MT285 is in the 34th · 5,383 models

Engine Displacement

= Effectively tied
MT265B91.4 ci
MT28591.4 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

MT265B is in the 18th percentile; MT285 is in the 18th · 5,580 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
MT265B3
MT2853
Median Utility Tractor4

MT265B is in the 23rd percentile; MT285 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models

Forward Gears

▲ MT285 higher · +8 (+100%)
MT265B8
MT28516
Median Utility Tractor12

MT265B is in the 23rd percentile; MT285 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models

MT265B (A)MT285 (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT265BChallenger MT285Difference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
ModelMT265BMT285—
CategoryUtilityUtilitySame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT265BChallenger MT285Difference
ManufacturerIsekiIsekiSame
ModelE3CD-VB40Not recorded—
Power Output33hp40.1hp▲ MT285+7.1 hp · +22%
Rated RPM2,600RPM2,600RPMSame
Cylinders33Same
Displacement91.4ci91.4ciSame
Bore3.4in3.4inSame
Stroke3.3in3.3inSame

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT265BChallenger MT285Difference
TypeSynchroShuttleSynchronized Power Shuttle—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT265BChallenger MT285Difference
Length121in122in▲ MT285+1 in · <1%
Width62.2in60.6in▲ MT265B+1.6 in · +3%
Height87.4in93.2in▲ MT285+5.8 in · +7%
Operating Weight3,136lb3,174lb▲ MT285+38 lb · +1%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT265BChallenger MT285Difference
System TypeOpen CenterOpen centerSame
Steering TypePowerPowerSame

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT265BChallenger MT285Difference
Hitch TypeCategory I3 Point—
Hitch Category1I—
Hitch PositionRearNot recorded—
Hitch Capacity2,535lb2,100lb▲ MT265B+435 lb · +21%

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT265BChallenger MT285Difference
Chassis Type4x4 MFWD 4WD4x4—
Drive TypeFour Wheel Drive (4WD)4WD—
Steering TypePowerPowerSame

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT265BChallenger MT285Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Capacities

SpecChallenger MT265BChallenger MT285Difference
Coolant1.8galNot recorded—

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT265BChallenger MT285Difference
TypeOpenROPS—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 55 hp
A · 25th percentile (33 hp)B · 34th percentile (40.1 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 18th percentile (91.4 ci)B · 18th percentile (91.4 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 23rd percentile (3)

Forward Gears

median 12
A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 73rd percentile (16)

Operating Weight

median 5,303 lb
A · 25th percentile (3,136 lb)B · 25th percentile (3,174 lb)
A · MT265BB · MT285Median Utility Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT265BFull spec pageChallenger MT285