ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT275B
Utility
- power
- 40.1 hp
- displacement
- 91.4 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 8
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT275B vs Challenger MT335
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT335
Sub-Compact
- power
- 33 hp
- displacement
- Not recorded
- Cylinders
- Not recorded
- Forward gears
- 16
ChallengerChallenger MT275B
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT335
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ MT275B higher · +7.1 hp (+22%)MT275B40.1 hp
MT33533 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT275B is in the 34th percentile; MT335 is in the 25th · 5,383 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT335 higher · +8 (+100%)MT275B8
MT33516
Median Utility Tractor12
MT275B is in the 23rd percentile; MT335 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
MT275B (A)MT335 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT275B | Challenger MT335 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | MT275B | MT335 | — |
| Category | Utility | Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT275B | Challenger MT335 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Iseki | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | E3CD-VTB10 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 40.1hp | 33hp | ▲ MT275B+7.1 hp · +22% |
| Rated RPM | 2,600RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 3 | Not recorded | — |
| Displacement | 91.4ci | Not recorded | — |
| Bore | 3.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 3.3in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT275B | Challenger MT335 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hydrostatic/SynchroShuttle | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT275B | Challenger MT335 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 121in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 62.2in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 87.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 3,169lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT275B | Challenger MT335 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT275B | Challenger MT335 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | I | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 2,535lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT275B | Challenger MT335 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT275B | Challenger MT335 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger MT275B | Challenger MT335 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 1.8gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 34th percentile (40.1 hp)B · 25th percentile (33 hp)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 23rd percentile (8)B · 73rd percentile (16)
A · MT275BB · MT335Median Utility Tractor