Head to head · Sub-Compact

Challenger MT335 vs Rhino 342

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT335

Sub-Compact

power
33 hp
displacement
Not recorded
Cylinders
Not recorded
Forward gears
16
Full MT335 specs
Rhino 342 Tractor
RhinoModel B

Rhino 342

Agricultural

power
34 hp
displacement
Not recorded
Cylinders
Not recorded
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full 342 specs
ChallengerChallenger MT335
vs
RhinoRhino 342

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact

n = 816–816

Engine Power

▲ 342 higher · +1 hp (+3%)
MT33533 hp
34234 hp
Median Sub-Compact Tractor26.9 hp

MT335 is in the 61st percentile; 342 is in the 62nd · 816 models

MT335 (A)342 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT335Rhino 342Difference
ManufacturerChallengerRhino—
ModelMT335342—
CategorySub-CompactAgricultural—

Engine

SpecChallenger MT335Rhino 342Difference
ManufacturerMitsubishiNot recorded—
Power Output33hp34hp▲ 342+1 hp · +3%

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT335Rhino 342Difference
TypeManualNot recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT335Rhino 342Difference
Hitch CategoryNot recordedIII—

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT335Rhino 342Difference
Chassis TypeNot recorded4x2 2WD—
Drive TypeNot recorded2WD—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT335Rhino 342Difference
Starter TypeElectricNot recorded—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 26.9 hp
A · 61st percentile (33 hp)B · 62nd percentile (34 hp)
A · MT335B · 342Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT335Full spec pageRhino 342