ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT475D
Row Crop
- power
- 123 hp
- displacement
- 299 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Row Crop
Challenger MT475D vs Challenger MT535
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT535
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 365 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 32
ChallengerChallenger MT475D
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT535
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Displacement
▲ MT535 higher · +66 ci (+22%)MT475D299 ci
MT535365 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
MT475D is in the 31st percentile; MT535 is in the 43rd · 1,409 models
Cylinders
▲ MT535 higher · +2 (+50%)MT475D4
MT5356
Median Row Crop Tractor6
MT475D is in the 17th percentile; MT535 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT475D higher · +6,165 lb (+64%)MT475D15,765 lb
MT5359,600 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
MT475D is in the 69th percentile; MT535 is in the 29th · 1,350 models
MT475D (A)MT535 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT475D | Challenger MT535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | MT475D | MT535 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT475D | Challenger MT535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO Power | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | 49AWI | 3056 | — |
| Power Output | 123hp | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 | ▲ MT535+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 299ci | 365ci | ▲ MT535+66 ci · +22% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 3.9in | ▲ MT475D+0.4 in · +10% |
| Stroke | 5.3in | 5in | ▲ MT475D+0.3 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT475D | Challenger MT535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously variable transmission (CVT) with two mechanical ranges | Partial Power Shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT475D | Challenger MT535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 179in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 88in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 109in | — |
| Wheelbase | 105in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 15,765lb | 9,600lb | ▲ MT475D+6,165 lb · +64% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT475D | Challenger MT535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Direct engine drive | Closed Center Pressure Flow Compensated (PFC) | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power | — |
Tires
| Spec | Challenger MT475D | Challenger MT535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 480/70R28 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 580/70R38 | Not recorded | — |
Tread Width
| Spec | Challenger MT475D | Challenger MT535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tread Width | 52.8in | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tread | 52.8in | Not recorded | — |
| Front Tread Adjustment | 52.8" to 87.8" | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tread Adjustment | 52.8" to 87.8" | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT475D | Challenger MT535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category II | II | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 2 | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT475D | Challenger MT535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Power | — |
| Brake Type | Multiple wet disc, hydraulically operated | Hydraulic wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT475D | Challenger MT535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT475D | Challenger MT535 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Optional Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 31st percentile (299 ci)B · 43rd percentile (365 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 17th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 69th percentile (15,765 lb)B · 29th percentile (9,600 lb)
A · MT475DB · MT535Median Row Crop Tractor