Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT485D
Agricultural
- power
- 137 hp
- displacement
- 299 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger MT485D vs Challenger MT495E
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT495E
Agricultural
- power
- 138 hp
- displacement
- 299 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 24
ChallengerChallenger MT485D
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT495E
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ MT495E higher · +1 hp (<1%)MT485D137 hp
MT495E138 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
MT485D is in the 64th percentile; MT495E is in the 65th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tiedMT485D299 ci
MT495E299 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
MT485D is in the 46th percentile; MT495E is in the 46th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT485D4
MT495E4
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
MT485D is in the 31st percentile; MT495E is in the 31st · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT495E higher · +880 lb (+6%)MT485D15,930 lb
MT495E16,810 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
MT485D is in the 74th percentile; MT495E is in the 76th · 971 models
MT485D (A)MT495E (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT485D | Challenger MT495E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | MT485D | MT495E | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT485D | Challenger MT495E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO Power Diesel | AGCO Power | — |
| Model | 49AWI | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 137hp | 138hp | ▲ MT495E+1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ MT485D+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 299ci | 299ci | Same |
| Bore | 4.3in | 4.3in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.3in | 5.3in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT485D | Challenger MT495E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | CVT (Continuously Variable Transmission) | TechStar CVT | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT485D | Challenger MT495E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | Not recorded | 72in | — |
| Wheelbase | Not recorded | 105in | — |
| Operating Weight | 15,930lb | 16,810lb | ▲ MT495E+880 lb · +6% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT485D | Challenger MT495E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Load Sensing (CCLS) | Open Center | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Tread Width
| Spec | Challenger MT485D | Challenger MT495E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tread Width | Not recorded | 60.2in | — |
| Rear Tread | Not recorded | 66.3in | — |
| Front Tread Adjustment | Not recorded | 60.2 to 89.8 inches | — |
| Rear Tread Adjustment | Not recorded | 66.3 to 96.7 inches | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT485D | Challenger MT495E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III/II | III/II | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 8,520lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT485D | Challenger MT495E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Hydraulic Wet Disc, operated by two foot pedals that can be locked together | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT485D | Challenger MT495E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electronic | — |
Emissions
| Spec | Challenger MT485D | Challenger MT495E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control System | Not recorded | SCR exhaust treatment | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 64th percentile (137 hp)B · 65th percentile (138 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 46th percentile (299 ci)B · 46th percentile (299 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 31st percentile (4)B · 31st percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 74th percentile (15,930 lb)B · 76th percentile (16,810 lb)
A · MT485DB · MT495EMedian Agricultural Tractor