ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT495D
Utility
- power
- 150 hp
- displacement
- 299 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 24
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT495D vs Fendt 1038
FendtModel B
Fendt 1038
Agricultural
- power
- 365 hp
- displacement
- Not recorded
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger MT495D
vs
FendtFendt 1038
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 1038 higher · +215 hp (+143%)MT495D150 hp
1038365 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT495D is in the 93rd percentile; 1038 is in the 98th · 5,383 models
Cylinders
▲ 1038 higher · +2 (+50%)MT495D4
10386
Median Utility Tractor4
MT495D is in the 50th percentile; 1038 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Operating Weight
▲ 1038 higher · +15,850 lb (+101%)MT495D15,765 lb
103831,615 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
MT495D is in the 93rd percentile; 1038 is in the 98th · 5,107 models
3-Point Hitch Capacity
▲ 1038 higher · +5,135 lb (+44%)MT495D11,755 lb
103816,890 lb
Median Utility Tractor3,197 lb
MT495D is in the 91st percentile; 1038 is in the 96th · 1,083 models
MT495D (A)1038 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT495D | Fendt 1038 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Fendt | — |
| Model | MT495D | 1038 | — |
| Category | Utility | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT495D | Fendt 1038 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO Power | Not recorded | — |
| Model | 49AWI | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 150hp | 365hp | ▲ 1038+215 hp · +143% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 1,700RPM | ▲ MT495D+500 RPM · +29% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 | ▲ 1038+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 299ci | Not recorded | — |
| Bore | 4.3in | 5in | ▲ 1038+0.7 in · +16% |
| Stroke | 5.3in | 6.5in | ▲ 1038+1.2 in · +23% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT495D | Fendt 1038 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | AutoPower VI / Techstar CVT | CVT (continuous variable transmission) | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT495D | Fendt 1038 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 243in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 142in | — |
| Operating Weight | 15,765lb | 31,615lb | ▲ 1038+15,850 lb · +101% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT495D | Fendt 1038 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Load Sensing (CCLS) | Not recorded | — |
| Pump Flow Capacity | 31.4gpm | 61.3gpm | ▲ 1038+29.9 gpm · +95% |
| Pressure | 2,930psi | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT495D | Fendt 1038 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 11,755lb | 16,890lb | ▲ 1038+5,135 lb · +44% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT495D | Fendt 1038 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | front wheel assist | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT495D | Fendt 1038 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 93rd percentile (150 hp)B · 98th percentile (365 hp)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 93rd percentile (15,765 lb)B · 98th percentile (31,615 lb)
3-Point Hitch Capacity
median 3,197 lbA · 91st percentile (11,755 lb)B · 96th percentile (16,890 lb)
A · MT495DB · 1038Median Utility Tractor