ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT495D
Utility
- power
- 150 hp
- displacement
- 299 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 24
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT495D vs Challenger MT525E
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT525E
Utility
- power
- 142 hp
- displacement
- 402 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
ChallengerChallenger MT495D
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT525E
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ MT495D higher · +8 hp (+6%)MT495D150 hp
MT525E142 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT495D is in the 93rd percentile; MT525E is in the 92nd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT525E higher · +103 ci (+34%)MT495D299 ci
MT525E402 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
MT495D is in the 84th percentile; MT525E is in the 90th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ MT525E higher · +2 (+50%)MT495D4
MT525E6
Median Utility Tractor4
MT495D is in the 50th percentile; MT525E is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT495D higher · +8 (+50%)MT495D24
MT525E16
Median Utility Tractor12
MT495D is in the 92nd percentile; MT525E is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
MT495D (A)MT525E (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT495D | Challenger MT525E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | MT495D | MT525E | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT495D | Challenger MT525E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO Power | AGCO Power | Same |
| Model | 49AWI | Z001B | — |
| Power Output | 150hp | 142hp | ▲ MT495D+8 hp · +6% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ MT495D+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 | ▲ MT525E+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 299ci | 402ci | ▲ MT525E+103 ci · +34% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 4.3in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.3in | 4.7in | ▲ MT495D+0.6 in · +13% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT495D | Challenger MT525E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | AutoPower VI / Techstar CVT | TechStar Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT495D | Challenger MT525E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Weight | 15,765lb | 15,200lb | ▲ MT495D+565 lb · +4% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT495D | Challenger MT525E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Load Sensing (CCLS) | Closed-Center Load Sensing | — |
| Pump Flow Capacity | 31.4gpm | 29.6gpm | ▲ MT495D+1.8 gpm · +6% |
| Pressure | 2,930psi | 2,870psi | ▲ MT495D+60 psi · +2% |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT495D | Challenger MT525E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | 2 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 11,755lb | 11,750lb | ▲ MT495D+5 lb · <1% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT495D | Challenger MT525E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | front wheel assist | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT495D | Challenger MT525E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | Not recorded | 12V | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | Challenger MT495D | Challenger MT525E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Not recorded | Tier IV | — |
| Control System | Not recorded | selective catalytic reduction (SCR) | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 93rd percentile (150 hp)B · 92nd percentile (142 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 84th percentile (299 ci)B · 90th percentile (402 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 92nd percentile (24)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 93rd percentile (15,765 lb)B · 93rd percentile (15,200 lb)
A · MT495DB · MT525EMedian Utility Tractor