Head to head · Utility

Challenger MT495D vs Challenger MT535D

Challenger MT495D Tractor
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT495D

Utility

power
150 hp
displacement
299 ci
Cylinders
4
Forward gears
24
Full MT495D specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT535D

Utility

power
144 hp
displacement
403 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full MT535D specs
ChallengerChallenger MT495D
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT535D

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 1,083–5,720

Engine Power

▲ MT495D higher · +6 hp (+4%)
MT495D150 hp
MT535D144 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp

MT495D is in the 93rd percentile; MT535D is in the 92nd · 5,383 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT535D higher · +104 ci (+35%)
MT495D299 ci
MT535D403 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

MT495D is in the 84th percentile; MT535D is in the 90th · 5,580 models

Cylinders

▲ MT535D higher · +2 (+50%)
MT495D4
MT535D6
Median Utility Tractor4

MT495D is in the 50th percentile; MT535D is in the 93rd · 5,720 models

Operating Weight

▲ MT535D higher · +990 lb (+6%)
MT495D15,765 lb
MT535D16,755 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb

MT495D is in the 93rd percentile; MT535D is in the 94th · 5,107 models

MT495D (A)MT535D (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT495DChallenger MT535DDifference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
ModelMT495DMT535D—
CategoryUtilityUtilitySame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT495DChallenger MT535DDifference
ManufacturerAGCO PowerAGCO PowerSame
Model49AWINot recorded—
Power Output150hp144hp▲ MT495D+6 hp · +4%
Rated RPM2,200RPM2,100RPM▲ MT495D+100 RPM · +5%
Cylinders46▲ MT535D+2 · +50%
Displacement299ci403ci▲ MT535D+104 ci · +35%
Bore4.3in4.3inSame
Stroke5.3in4.7in▲ MT495D+0.6 in · +13%

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT495DChallenger MT535DDifference
TypeAutoPower VI / Techstar CVTContinuously Variable Transmission (CVT)—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT495DChallenger MT535DDifference
Operating Weight15,765lb16,755lb▲ MT535D+990 lb · +6%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT495DChallenger MT535DDifference
System TypeClosed Center Load Sensing (CCLS)Closed Center Load Sensing (CCLS)Same
Pump Flow Capacity31.4gpm29.4gpm▲ MT495D+2 gpm · +7%
Pressure2,930psiNot recorded—
Steering TypeHydrostatic PowerHydrostatic PowerSame

Tread Width

SpecChallenger MT495DChallenger MT535DDifference
Front Tread WidthNot recorded60.2in—
Rear TreadNot recorded61.7in—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT495DChallenger MT535DDifference
Hitch CategoryIIIII/II—
Hitch PositionRearRearSame
Hitch Capacity11,755lb11,755lbSame

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT495DChallenger MT535DDifference
Chassis Typefront wheel assistNot recorded—
Steering TypeHydrostatic PowerHydrostatic PowerSame

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT495DChallenger MT535DDifference
Starter TypeElectricElectric Starter, 12 volt—

Emissions

SpecChallenger MT495DChallenger MT535DDifference
StandardNot recordedInterim Tier IV—
Control SystemNot recordedSelective Catalytic Reduction (SCR)—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 55 hp
A · 93rd percentile (150 hp)B · 92nd percentile (144 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 84th percentile (299 ci)B · 90th percentile (403 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 50th percentile (4)B · 93rd percentile (6)

Operating Weight

median 5,303 lb
A · 93rd percentile (15,765 lb)B · 94th percentile (16,755 lb)

3-Point Hitch Capacity

median 3,197 lb
A · 91st percentile (11,755 lb)B · 91st percentile (11,755 lb)
A · MT495DB · MT535DMedian Utility Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT495DFull spec pageChallenger MT535D