
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT495D
Utility
- power
- 150 hp
- displacement
- 299 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 24
Head to head · Utility

Utility
Agricultural
How they compare
MT495D is in the 93rd percentile; 1042 is in the 98th · 5,383 models
MT495D is in the 50th percentile; 1042 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
MT495D is in the 93rd percentile; 1042 is in the 98th · 5,107 models
MT495D is in the 91st percentile; 1042 is in the 97th · 1,083 models
Full comparison
| Spec | Challenger MT495D | Fendt 1042 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Fendt | — |
| Model | MT495D | 1042 | — |
| Category | Utility | Agricultural | — |
| Spec | Challenger MT495D | Fendt 1042 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO Power | MAN | — |
| Model | 49AWI | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 150hp | 410hp | ▲ 1042+260 hp · +173% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 1,700RPM | ▲ MT495D+500 RPM · +29% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 | ▲ 1042+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 299ci | Not recorded | — |
| Bore | 4.3in | 5in | ▲ 1042+0.7 in · +16% |
| Stroke | 5.3in | 6.5in | ▲ 1042+1.2 in · +23% |
| Spec | Challenger MT495D | Fendt 1042 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | AutoPower VI / Techstar CVT | CVT | — |
| Spec | Challenger MT495D | Fendt 1042 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 243in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 142in | — |
| Wheelbase | Not recorded | 130in | — |
| Operating Weight | 15,765lb | 31,615lb | ▲ 1042+15,850 lb · +101% |
| Spec | Challenger MT495D | Fendt 1042 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Load Sensing (CCLS) | Not recorded | — |
| Pump Flow Capacity | 31.4gpm | 61.3gpm | ▲ 1042+29.9 gpm · +95% |
| Pressure | 2,930psi | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
| Spec | Challenger MT495D | Fendt 1042 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tread Width | Not recorded | 79.9in | — |
| Rear Tread | Not recorded | 74.8in | — |
| Front Tread Adjustment | Not recorded | 79.9-88.6 | — |
| Rear Tread Adjustment | Not recorded | 74.8-88.6 | — |
| Spec | Challenger MT495D | Fendt 1042 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 11,755lb | 18,455lb | ▲ 1042+6,700 lb · +57% |
| Spec | Challenger MT495D | Fendt 1042 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | front wheel assist | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
| Spec | Challenger MT495D | Fendt 1042 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
| Spec | Challenger MT495D | Fendt 1042 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Not recorded | Tier 4 | — |
| Control System | Not recorded | D.E.F. (diesel exhaust fluid) exhaust treatment | — |
| Spec | Challenger MT495D | Fendt 1042 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fuel Capacity | Not recorded | 211gal | — |
Category context