Head to head · Utility

Challenger MT525D vs Massey Ferguson 8737

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT525D

Utility

power
136 hp
displacement
402 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full MT525D specs
Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B

Massey Ferguson 8737

Agricultural

power
205 hp
displacement
513 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full 8737 specs
ChallengerChallenger MT525D
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 8737

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 1,083–5,720

Engine Power

▲ 8737 higher · +69 hp (+51%)
MT525D136 hp
8737205 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp

MT525D is in the 92nd percentile; 8737 is in the 95th · 5,383 models

Engine Displacement

▲ 8737 higher · +111 ci (+28%)
MT525D402 ci
8737513 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

MT525D is in the 90th percentile; 8737 is in the 94th · 5,580 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
MT525D6
87376
Median Utility Tractor4

MT525D is in the 93rd percentile; 8737 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models

Operating Weight

▲ 8737 higher · +14,790 lb (+106%)
MT525D13,920 lb
873728,710 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb

MT525D is in the 92nd percentile; 8737 is in the 97th · 5,107 models

MT525D (A)8737 (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT525DMassey Ferguson 8737Difference
ManufacturerChallengerMassey Ferguson—
ModelMT525D8737—
CategoryUtilityAgricultural—

Engine

SpecChallenger MT525DMassey Ferguson 8737Difference
ManufacturerSisu AGCO PowerAGCO Power—
Power Output136hp205hp▲ 8737+69 hp · +51%
Rated RPMNot recorded2,100RPM—
Cylinders66Same
Displacement402ci513ci▲ 8737+111 ci · +28%
Bore4.3in4.4in▲ 8737+0.1 in · +2%
Stroke4.7in5.7in▲ 8737+1 in · +21%

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT525DMassey Ferguson 8737Difference
TypeSelective gear fixed ratio with partial (4) range operator-controlled powershiftContinuously variable transmission (CVT)—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT525DMassey Ferguson 8737Difference
LengthNot recorded219in—
HeightNot recorded141in—
Wheelbase113inNot recorded—
Operating Weight13,920lb28,710lb▲ 8737+14,790 lb · +106%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT525DMassey Ferguson 8737Difference
System TypeClosed Center Load Sensing (CCLS)Closed center load sensing (CCLS)Same
Pump Flow Capacity25.1gpm53.1gpm▲ 8737+28 gpm · +112%
Pressure2,170psiNot recorded—
Steering TypeHydrostatic PowerHydrostatic powerSame

Tires

SpecChallenger MT525DMassey Ferguson 8737Difference
Front Tire Size420/85R28Not recorded—
Rear Tire Size520/85R38Not recorded—

Tread Width

SpecChallenger MT525DMassey Ferguson 8737Difference
Front Tread WidthNot recorded61.5in—
Rear TreadNot recorded76in—
Front Tread AdjustmentNot recorded61.5 to 89.4 in—
Rear Tread AdjustmentNot recorded76.0 to 89.1 in—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT525DMassey Ferguson 8737Difference
Hitch TypeThree-Point HitchCategory III/IVN—
Hitch CategoryIICategory III—
Hitch PositionRearRearSame
Hitch Capacity11,755lb22,460lb▲ 8737+10,705 lb · +91%

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT525DMassey Ferguson 8737Difference
Chassis TypeFront wheel assistNot recorded—
Steering TypeHydrostatic PowerHydrostatic powerSame

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT525DMassey Ferguson 8737Difference
Starter TypeElectric12 volt—

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT525DMassey Ferguson 8737Difference
TypeNot recordedCab—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 55 hp
A · 92nd percentile (136 hp)B · 95th percentile (205 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 90th percentile (402 ci)B · 94th percentile (513 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)

Operating Weight

median 5,303 lb
A · 92nd percentile (13,920 lb)B · 97th percentile (28,710 lb)

3-Point Hitch Capacity

median 3,197 lb
A · 91st percentile (11,755 lb)B · 99th percentile (22,460 lb)
A · MT525DB · 8737Median Utility Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT525DFull spec pageMassey Ferguson 8737