Head to head · Utility

Challenger MT525D vs Challenger MT535D

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT525D

Utility

power
136 hp
displacement
402 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full MT525D specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT535D

Utility

power
144 hp
displacement
403 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full MT535D specs
ChallengerChallenger MT525D
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT535D

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 1,0835,720

Engine Power

▲ MT535D higher · +8 hp (+6%)
MT525D136 hp
MT535D144 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp

MT525D is in the 92nd percentile; MT535D is in the 92nd · 5,383 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT535D higher · +1 ci (<1%)
MT525D402 ci
MT535D403 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

MT525D is in the 90th percentile; MT535D is in the 90th · 5,580 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
MT525D6
MT535D6
Median Utility Tractor4

MT525D is in the 93rd percentile; MT535D is in the 93rd · 5,720 models

Operating Weight

▲ MT535D higher · +2,835 lb (+20%)
MT525D13,920 lb
MT535D16,755 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb

MT525D is in the 92nd percentile; MT535D is in the 94th · 5,107 models

MT525D (A)MT535D (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT525DChallenger MT535DDifference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
ModelMT525DMT535D
CategoryUtilityUtilitySame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT525DChallenger MT535DDifference
ManufacturerSisu AGCO PowerAGCO Power
Power Output136hp144hpMT535D+8 hp · +6%
Rated RPMNot recorded2,100RPM
Cylinders66Same
Displacement402ci403ciMT535D+1 ci · <1%
Bore4.3in4.3inSame
Stroke4.7in4.7inSame

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT525DChallenger MT535DDifference
TypeSelective gear fixed ratio with partial (4) range operator-controlled powershiftContinuously Variable Transmission (CVT)

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT525DChallenger MT535DDifference
Wheelbase113inNot recorded
Operating Weight13,920lb16,755lbMT535D+2,835 lb · +20%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT525DChallenger MT535DDifference
System TypeClosed Center Load Sensing (CCLS)Closed Center Load Sensing (CCLS)Same
Pump Flow Capacity25.1gpm29.4gpmMT535D+4.3 gpm · +17%
Pressure2,170psiNot recorded
Steering TypeHydrostatic PowerHydrostatic PowerSame

Tires

SpecChallenger MT525DChallenger MT535DDifference
Front Tire Size420/85R28Not recorded
Rear Tire Size520/85R38Not recorded

Tread Width

SpecChallenger MT525DChallenger MT535DDifference
Front Tread WidthNot recorded60.2in
Rear TreadNot recorded61.7in

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT525DChallenger MT535DDifference
Hitch TypeThree-Point HitchNot recorded
Hitch CategoryIIIII/II
Hitch PositionRearRearSame
Hitch Capacity11,755lb11,755lbSame

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT525DChallenger MT535DDifference
Chassis TypeFront wheel assistNot recorded
Steering TypeHydrostatic PowerHydrostatic PowerSame

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT525DChallenger MT535DDifference
Starter TypeElectricElectric Starter, 12 volt

Emissions

SpecChallenger MT525DChallenger MT535DDifference
StandardNot recordedInterim Tier IV
Control SystemNot recordedSelective Catalytic Reduction (SCR)

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 55 hp
A · 92nd percentile (136 hp)B · 92nd percentile (144 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 90th percentile (402 ci)B · 90th percentile (403 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)

Operating Weight

median 5,303 lb
A · 92nd percentile (13,920 lb)B · 94th percentile (16,755 lb)

3-Point Hitch Capacity

median 3,197 lb
A · 91st percentile (11,755 lb)B · 91st percentile (11,755 lb)
A · MT525DB · MT535DMedian Utility Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT525DFull spec pageChallenger MT535D