ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT535
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 365 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 32
Head to head · Row Crop
Challenger MT535 vs John Deere 4025
John DeereModel B
John Deere 4025
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 404 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 8
ChallengerChallenger MT535
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 4025
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Displacement
▲ 4025 higher · +39 ci (+11%)MT535365 ci
4025404 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
MT535 is in the 43rd percentile; 4025 is in the 57th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT5356
40256
Median Row Crop Tractor6
MT535 is in the 50th percentile; 4025 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT535 higher · +24 (+300%)MT53532
40258
Median Row Crop Tractor16
MT535 is in the 91st percentile; 4025 is in the 16th · 1,200 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT535 higher · +1,045 lb (+12%)MT5359,600 lb
40258,555 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
MT535 is in the 29th percentile; 4025 is in the 23rd · 1,350 models
MT535 (A)4025 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT535 | John Deere 4025 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | John Deere | — |
| Model | MT535 | 4025 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT535 | John Deere 4025 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | John Deere | — |
| Model | 3056 | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ 4025+300 RPM · +14% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 365ci | 404ci | ▲ 4025+39 ci · +11% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 4.3in | ▲ 4025+0.4 in · +10% |
| Stroke | 5in | 4.8in | ▲ MT535+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT535 | John Deere 4025 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Partial Power Shift | Partially synchronized and full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT535 | John Deere 4025 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 179in | 153in | ▲ MT535+26 in · +17% |
| Width | 88in | 89.6in | ▲ 4025+1.6 in · +2% |
| Height | 109in | 90.8in | ▲ MT535+18.2 in · +20% |
| Operating Weight | 9,600lb | 8,555lb | ▲ MT535+1,045 lb · +12% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT535 | John Deere 4025 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Pressure Flow Compensated (PFC) | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT535 | John Deere 4025 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | II | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | II/I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT535 | John Deere 4025 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT535 | John Deere 4025 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT535 | John Deere 4025 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Optional Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 43rd percentile (365 ci)B · 57th percentile (404 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 91st percentile (32)B · 16th percentile (8)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 29th percentile (9,600 lb)B · 23rd percentile (8,555 lb)
Length
median 180 inA · 50th percentile (179 in)B · 18th percentile (153 in)
A · MT535B · 4025Median Row Crop Tractor