Head to head · Utility

Challenger MT535D vs Massey Ferguson 3525

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT535D

Utility

power
144 hp
displacement
403 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full MT535D specs
Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B

Massey Ferguson 3525

Utility

power
123 hp
displacement
354 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full 3525 specs
ChallengerChallenger MT535D
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 3525

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 1,083–5,720

Engine Power

▲ MT535D higher · +21 hp (+17%)
MT535D144 hp
3525123 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp

MT535D is in the 92nd percentile; 3525 is in the 90th · 5,383 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT535D higher · +49 ci (+14%)
MT535D403 ci
3525354 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

MT535D is in the 90th percentile; 3525 is in the 86th · 5,580 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
MT535D6
35256
Median Utility Tractor4

MT535D is in the 93rd percentile; 3525 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models

Operating Weight

▲ MT535D higher · +3,655 lb (+28%)
MT535D16,755 lb
352513,100 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb

MT535D is in the 94th percentile; 3525 is in the 91st · 5,107 models

MT535D (A)3525 (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT535DMassey Ferguson 3525Difference
ManufacturerChallengerMassey Ferguson—
ModelMT535D3525—
CategoryUtilityUtilitySame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT535DMassey Ferguson 3525Difference
ManufacturerAGCO PowerPerkins—
Power Output144hp123hp▲ MT535D+21 hp · +17%
Rated RPM2,100RPM2,200RPM▲ 3525+100 RPM · +5%
Cylinders66Same
Displacement403ci354ci▲ MT535D+49 ci · +14%
Bore4.3in3.9in▲ MT535D+0.4 in · +10%
Stroke4.7in5in▲ 3525+0.3 in · +6%

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT535DMassey Ferguson 3525Difference
TypeContinuously Variable Transmission (CVT)Partial power shift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT535DMassey Ferguson 3525Difference
LengthNot recorded185in—
WidthNot recorded94in—
Operating Weight16,755lb13,100lb▲ MT535D+3,655 lb · +28%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT535DMassey Ferguson 3525Difference
System TypeClosed Center Load Sensing (CCLS)Open center—
Pump Flow Capacity29.4gpm20.1gpm▲ MT535D+9.3 gpm · +46%
Steering TypeHydrostatic PowerHydrostatic powerSame

Power Take-off (PTO)

SpecChallenger MT535DMassey Ferguson 3525Difference
Power RatingNot recorded123hp—

Tread Width

SpecChallenger MT535DMassey Ferguson 3525Difference
Front Tread Width60.2inNot recorded—
Rear Tread61.7inNot recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT535DMassey Ferguson 3525Difference
Hitch TypeNot recordedCategory II—
Hitch CategoryIII/IINot recorded—
Hitch PositionRearRearSame
Hitch Capacity11,755lb8,270lb▲ MT535D+3,485 lb · +42%

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT535DMassey Ferguson 3525Difference
Steering TypeHydrostatic PowerHydrostatic powerSame

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT535DMassey Ferguson 3525Difference
Starter TypeElectric Starter, 12 voltElectric—

Emissions

SpecChallenger MT535DMassey Ferguson 3525Difference
StandardInterim Tier IVNot recorded—
Control SystemSelective Catalytic Reduction (SCR)Not recorded—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 55 hp
A · 92nd percentile (144 hp)B · 90th percentile (123 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 90th percentile (403 ci)B · 86th percentile (354 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)

Operating Weight

median 5,303 lb
A · 94th percentile (16,755 lb)B · 91st percentile (13,100 lb)

3-Point Hitch Capacity

median 3,197 lb
A · 91st percentile (11,755 lb)B · 87th percentile (8,270 lb)
A · MT535DB · 3525Median Utility Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT535DFull spec pageMassey Ferguson 3525