Head to head · Utility

Challenger MT525E vs Challenger MT535D

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT525E

Utility

power
142 hp
displacement
402 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full MT525E specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT535D

Utility

power
144 hp
displacement
403 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full MT535D specs
ChallengerChallenger MT525E
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT535D

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 1,083–5,720

Engine Power

▲ MT535D higher · +2 hp (+1%)
MT525E142 hp
MT535D144 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp

MT525E is in the 92nd percentile; MT535D is in the 92nd · 5,383 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT535D higher · +1 ci (<1%)
MT525E402 ci
MT535D403 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

MT525E is in the 90th percentile; MT535D is in the 90th · 5,580 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
MT525E6
MT535D6
Median Utility Tractor4

MT525E is in the 93rd percentile; MT535D is in the 93rd · 5,720 models

Operating Weight

▲ MT535D higher · +1,555 lb (+10%)
MT525E15,200 lb
MT535D16,755 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb

MT525E is in the 93rd percentile; MT535D is in the 94th · 5,107 models

MT525E (A)MT535D (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT525EChallenger MT535DDifference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
ModelMT525EMT535D—
CategoryUtilityUtilitySame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT525EChallenger MT535DDifference
ManufacturerAGCO PowerAGCO PowerSame
ModelZ001BNot recorded—
Power Output142hp144hp▲ MT535D+2 hp · +1%
Rated RPM2,100RPM2,100RPMSame
Cylinders66Same
Displacement402ci403ci▲ MT535D+1 ci · <1%
Bore4.3in4.3inSame
Stroke4.7in4.7inSame

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT525EChallenger MT535DDifference
TypeTechStar Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT)Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT)—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT525EChallenger MT535DDifference
Operating Weight15,200lb16,755lb▲ MT535D+1,555 lb · +10%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT525EChallenger MT535DDifference
System TypeClosed-Center Load SensingClosed Center Load Sensing (CCLS)—
Pump Flow Capacity29.6gpm29.4gpm▲ MT525E+0.2 gpm · <1%
Pressure2,870psiNot recorded—
Steering TypeNot recordedHydrostatic Power—

Tread Width

SpecChallenger MT525EChallenger MT535DDifference
Front Tread WidthNot recorded60.2in—
Rear TreadNot recorded61.7in—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT525EChallenger MT535DDifference
Hitch Category2III/II—
Hitch PositionRearRearSame
Hitch Capacity11,750lb11,755lb▲ MT535D+5 lb · <1%

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT525EChallenger MT535DDifference
Steering TypeNot recordedHydrostatic Power—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT525EChallenger MT535DDifference
Battery Voltage12VNot recorded—
Starter TypeElectricElectric Starter, 12 volt—

Emissions

SpecChallenger MT525EChallenger MT535DDifference
StandardTier IVInterim Tier IV—
Control Systemselective catalytic reduction (SCR)Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR)Same

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 55 hp
A · 92nd percentile (142 hp)B · 92nd percentile (144 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 90th percentile (402 ci)B · 90th percentile (403 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 93rd percentile (6)B · 93rd percentile (6)

Operating Weight

median 5,303 lb
A · 93rd percentile (15,200 lb)B · 94th percentile (16,755 lb)

3-Point Hitch Capacity

median 3,197 lb
A · 91st percentile (11,750 lb)B · 91st percentile (11,755 lb)
A · MT525EB · MT535DMedian Utility Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT525EFull spec pageChallenger MT535D