Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT655B
Agricultural
- power
- 260 hp
- displacement
- 513 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger MT655B vs Challenger MT755
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT755
Agricultural
- power
- 270 hp
- displacement
- 537 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 30
ChallengerChallenger MT655B
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT755
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ MT755 higher · +10 hp (+4%)MT655B260 hp
MT755270 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
MT655B is in the 89th percentile; MT755 is in the 91st · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT755 higher · +24 ci (+5%)MT655B513 ci
MT755537 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
MT655B is in the 88th percentile; MT755 is in the 89th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT655B6
MT7556
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
MT655B is in the 74th percentile; MT755 is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT755 higher · +9,815 lb (+50%)MT655B19,550 lb
MT75529,365 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
MT655B is in the 82nd percentile; MT755 is in the 94th · 971 models
MT655B (A)MT755 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT655B | Challenger MT755 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | MT655B | MT755 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT655B | Challenger MT755 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Sisu | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | 84ETA | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 260hp | 270hp | ▲ MT755+10 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ MT655B+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 513ci | 537ci | ▲ MT755+24 ci · +5% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.4in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.7in | 5.9in | ▲ MT755+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT655B | Challenger MT755 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | continuously variable transmission (CVT) | Selective gear fixed ratio with full range operator controlled power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT655B | Challenger MT755 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 206in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 118in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 124in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 19,550lb | 29,365lb | ▲ MT755+9,815 lb · +50% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT655B | Challenger MT755 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | pressure flow compensated (PFC) | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Electro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheel | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT655B | Challenger MT755 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | III | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT655B | Challenger MT755 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Electro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheel | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Hydraulic wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT655B | Challenger MT755 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | Not recorded | 12V | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger MT655B | Challenger MT755 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 8.9gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 89th percentile (260 hp)B · 91st percentile (270 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 88th percentile (513 ci)B · 89th percentile (537 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 82nd percentile (19,550 lb)B · 94th percentile (29,365 lb)
A · MT655BB · MT755Median Agricultural Tractor