ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT675D
Agricultural
- power
- 328 hp
- displacement
- 514 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger MT675D vs Challenger MT835
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT835
Agricultural
- power
- 340 hp
- displacement
- 729 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
ChallengerChallenger MT675D
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT835
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ MT835 higher · +12 hp (+4%)MT675D328 hp
MT835340 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
MT675D is in the 95th percentile; MT835 is in the 96th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT835 higher · +215 ci (+42%)MT675D514 ci
MT835729 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
MT675D is in the 88th percentile; MT835 is in the 95th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT675D6
MT8356
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
MT675D is in the 74th percentile; MT835 is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT835 higher · +14,635 lb (+58%)MT675D25,365 lb
MT83540,000 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
MT675D is in the 92nd percentile; MT835 is in the 97th · 971 models
MT675D (A)MT835 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT675D | Challenger MT835 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | MT675D | MT835 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT675D | Challenger MT835 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Sisu Diesel (AGCO Power) | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | Not recorded | C12 | — |
| Power Output | 328hp | 340hp | ▲ MT835+12 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 514ci | 729ci | ▲ MT835+215 ci · +42% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 5.1in | ▲ MT835+0.7 in · +16% |
| Stroke | 5.7in | 5.9in | ▲ MT835+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT675D | Challenger MT835 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously variable transmission (Techstar CVT) | Full Power Shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT675D | Challenger MT835 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 216in | 266in | ▲ MT835+50 in · +23% |
| Width | Not recorded | 142in | — |
| Height | 141in | 139in | ▲ MT675D+2 in · +1% |
| Operating Weight | 25,365lb | 40,000lb | ▲ MT835+14,635 lb · +58% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT675D | Challenger MT835 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center load sensing (CCLS) | Closed Center Load Sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | Challenger MT675D | Challenger MT835 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 480/80R46 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 480/80R46 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT675D | Challenger MT835 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category III Quick Hitch | Type IVN | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT675D | Challenger MT835 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4-Wheel drive | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic power | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Hydraulic Wet Disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT675D | Challenger MT835 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | 12V Electric | Electric | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT675D | Challenger MT835 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Cab | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 95th percentile (328 hp)B · 96th percentile (340 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 88th percentile (514 ci)B · 95th percentile (729 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 92nd percentile (25,365 lb)B · 97th percentile (40,000 lb)
Length
median 173 inA · 88th percentile (216 in)B · 98th percentile (266 in)
A · MT675DB · MT835Median Agricultural Tractor