Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT743
Crawler
- power
- 425 hp
- displacement
- 599 ci
- Cylinders
- 7
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger MT743 vs Fendt 1050
Image not recorded
FendtModel B
Fendt 1050
Agricultural
- power
- 483 hp
- displacement
- Not recorded
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger MT743
vs
FendtFendt 1050
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ 1050 higher · +58 hp (+14%)MT743425 hp
1050483 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
MT743 is in the 98th percentile; 1050 is in the 98th · 1,028 models
Cylinders
▲ MT743 higher · +1 (+17%)MT7437
10506
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
MT743 is in the 98th percentile; 1050 is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT743 higher · +4,605 lb (+15%)MT74336,220 lb
105031,615 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
MT743 is in the 97th percentile; 1050 is in the 95th · 971 models
3-Point Hitch Capacity
▲ MT743 higher · +2,110 lb (+12%)MT74319,000 lb
105016,890 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor12,126 lb
MT743 is in the 82nd percentile; 1050 is in the 72nd · 93 models
MT743 (A)1050 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT743 | Fendt 1050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Fendt | — |
| Model | MT743 | 1050 | — |
| Category | Crawler, Agricultural | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT743 | Fendt 1050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO Power | Not recorded | — |
| Model | AGCO Power 9.8 L | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 425hp | 483hp | ▲ 1050+58 hp · +14% |
| Rated RPM | 1,700RPM | 1,700RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 7 | 6 | ▲ MT743+1 · +17% |
| Displacement | 599ci | Not recorded | — |
| Bore | 4.4in | 5in | ▲ 1050+0.6 in · +14% |
| Stroke | 5.7in | 6.5in | ▲ 1050+0.8 in · +14% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT743 | Fendt 1050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | CVT. Infinitely variable hydrostatic using variable-displacement pump and motors | CVT with a combination of mechanical and hydrostatic sections | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT743 | Fendt 1050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 243in | — |
| Width | 88in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 142in | — |
| Operating Weight | 36,220lb | 31,615lb | ▲ MT743+4,605 lb · +15% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT743 | Fendt 1050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Load sensing | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Challenger MT743 | Fendt 1050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Power Rating | 377hp | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT743 | Fendt 1050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category III/IVN | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 19,000lb | 16,890lb | ▲ MT743+2,110 lb · +12% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT743 | Fendt 1050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Crawler | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | Tracks | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT743 | Fendt 1050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT743 | Fendt 1050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 98th percentile (425 hp)B · 98th percentile (483 hp)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 98th percentile (7)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 97th percentile (36,220 lb)B · 95th percentile (31,615 lb)
3-Point Hitch Capacity
median 12,126 lbA · 82nd percentile (19,000 lb)B · 72nd percentile (16,890 lb)
A · MT743B · 1050Median Agricultural Tractor