Head to head · Crawler

Challenger MT743 vs Challenger MT765B

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT743

Crawler

power
425 hp
displacement
599 ci
Cylinders
7
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full MT743 specs
Challenger MT765B Tractor
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT765B

Articulated

power
321 hp
displacement
537 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full MT765B specs
ChallengerChallenger MT743
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT765B

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Crawler

n = 142–192

Engine Power

▲ MT743 higher · +104 hp (+32%)
MT743425 hp
MT765B321 hp
Median Crawler Tractor200 hp

MT743 is in the 79th percentile; MT765B is in the 66th · 142 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT743 higher · +62 ci (+12%)
MT743599 ci
MT765B537 ci
Median Crawler Tractor468 ci

MT743 is in the 66th percentile; MT765B is in the 59th · 191 models

Cylinders

▲ MT743 higher · +1 (+17%)
MT7437
MT765B6
Median Crawler Tractor6

MT743 is in the 97th percentile; MT765B is in the 50th · 192 models

Operating Weight

▲ MT743 higher · +5,135 lb (+17%)
MT74336,220 lb
MT765B31,085 lb
Median Crawler Tractor23,320 lb

MT743 is in the 77th percentile; MT765B is in the 66th · 173 models

MT743 (A)MT765B (B)Median Crawler Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT743Challenger MT765BDifference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
ModelMT743MT765B—
CategoryCrawler, AgriculturalArticulated—

Engine

SpecChallenger MT743Challenger MT765BDifference
ManufacturerAGCO PowerCaterpillar—
ModelAGCO Power 9.8 LC9 ACERT Tech Tier 3—
Power Output425hp321hp▲ MT743+104 hp · +32%
Rated RPM1,700RPM2,100RPM▲ MT765B+400 RPM · +24%
Cylinders76▲ MT743+1 · +17%
Displacement599ci537ci▲ MT743+62 ci · +12%
Bore4.4in4.4inSame
Stroke5.7in5.9in▲ MT765B+0.2 in · +4%

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT743Challenger MT765BDifference
TypeCVT. Infinitely variable hydrostatic using variable-displacement pump and motorsPowerShift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT743Challenger MT765BDifference
LengthNot recorded233in—
Width88in88inSame
HeightNot recorded136in—
Operating Weight36,220lb31,085lb▲ MT743+5,135 lb · +17%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT743Challenger MT765BDifference
System TypeLoad sensingClosed-center PFC—
Steering TypePowerNot recorded—

Power Take-off (PTO)

SpecChallenger MT743Challenger MT765BDifference
Power Rating377hpNot recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT743Challenger MT765BDifference
Hitch TypeCategory III/IVNStandard Cat.3/3N—
Hitch CategoryNot recordedCategory 3—
Hitch PositionRearRearSame
Hitch Capacity19,000lb17,263lb▲ MT743+1,737 lb · +10%

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT743Challenger MT765BDifference
Chassis TypeCrawlerTracklayer-rubber tracked—
Drive TypeTracks4WD—
Steering TypePowerNot recorded—
Brake TypeNot recordedWet Disc—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT743Challenger MT765BDifference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT743Challenger MT765BDifference
TypeCabCabSame

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 200 hp
A · 79th percentile (425 hp)B · 66th percentile (321 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 468 ci
A · 66th percentile (599 ci)B · 59th percentile (537 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 97th percentile (7)B · 50th percentile (6)

Operating Weight

median 23,320 lb
A · 77th percentile (36,220 lb)B · 66th percentile (31,085 lb)

Width

median 79.5 in
A · 53rd percentile (88 in)B · 53rd percentile (88 in)
A · MT743B · MT765BMedian Crawler Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT743Full spec pageChallenger MT765B