Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT743
Crawler
- power
- 425 hp
- displacement
- 599 ci
- Cylinders
- 7
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger MT743 vs Fendt 828
Image not recorded
FendtModel B
Fendt 828
Agricultural
- power
- 260 hp
- displacement
- 370 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 4
ChallengerChallenger MT743
vs
FendtFendt 828
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ MT743 higher · +165 hp (+63%)MT743425 hp
828260 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
MT743 is in the 98th percentile; 828 is in the 89th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT743 higher · +229 ci (+62%)MT743599 ci
828370 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
MT743 is in the 92nd percentile; 828 is in the 61st · 1,083 models
Cylinders
▲ MT743 higher · +1 (+17%)MT7437
8286
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
MT743 is in the 98th percentile; 828 is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT743 higher · +15,386 lb (+74%)MT74336,220 lb
82820,834 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
MT743 is in the 97th percentile; 828 is in the 86th · 971 models
MT743 (A)828 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT743 | Fendt 828 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Fendt | — |
| Model | MT743 | 828 | — |
| Category | Crawler, Agricultural | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT743 | Fendt 828 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO Power | Not recorded | — |
| Model | AGCO Power 9.8 L | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 425hp | 260hp | ▲ MT743+165 hp · +63% |
| Rated RPM | 1,700RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ 828+400 RPM · +24% |
| Cylinders | 7 | 6 | ▲ MT743+1 · +17% |
| Displacement | 599ci | 370ci | ▲ MT743+229 ci · +62% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4in | ▲ MT743+0.4 in · +10% |
| Stroke | 5.7in | 5in | ▲ MT743+0.7 in · +14% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT743 | Fendt 828 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | CVT. Infinitely variable hydrostatic using variable-displacement pump and motors | Continuously variable Vario transmission | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT743 | Fendt 828 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 208in | — |
| Width | 88in | 101in | ▲ 828+13 in · +15% |
| Operating Weight | 36,220lb | 20,834lb | ▲ MT743+15,386 lb · +74% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT743 | Fendt 828 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Load sensing | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Challenger MT743 | Fendt 828 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Power Rating | 377hp | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT743 | Fendt 828 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category III/IVN | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 19,000lb | 11,307lb | ▲ MT743+7,693 lb · +68% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT743 | Fendt 828 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Crawler | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | Tracks | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT743 | Fendt 828 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT743 | Fendt 828 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 98th percentile (425 hp)B · 89th percentile (260 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 92nd percentile (599 ci)B · 61st percentile (370 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 98th percentile (7)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 97th percentile (36,220 lb)B · 86th percentile (20,834 lb)
Width
median 79.5 inA · 63rd percentile (88 in)B · 86th percentile (101 in)
A · MT743B · 828Median Agricultural Tractor