Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT743
Crawler
- power
- 425 hp
- displacement
- 599 ci
- Cylinders
- 7
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Crawler
Challenger MT743 vs John Deere 8330T 235 PTO hp
Image not recorded
John DeereModel B
John Deere 8330T 235 PTO hp
Crawler
- power
- 280 hp
- displacement
- 549 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
ChallengerChallenger MT743
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 8330T 235 PTO hp
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Crawler
Engine Power
▲ MT743 higher · +145 hp (+52%)MT743425 hp
8330T 235 PTO hp280 hp
Median Crawler Tractor200 hp
MT743 is in the 79th percentile; 8330T 235 PTO hp is in the 62nd · 142 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT743 higher · +50 ci (+9%)MT743599 ci
8330T 235 PTO hp549 ci
Median Crawler Tractor468 ci
MT743 is in the 66th percentile; 8330T 235 PTO hp is in the 64th · 191 models
Cylinders
▲ MT743 higher · +1 (+17%)MT7437
8330T 235 PTO hp6
Median Crawler Tractor6
MT743 is in the 97th percentile; 8330T 235 PTO hp is in the 50th · 192 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT743 higher · +9,160 lb (+34%)MT74336,220 lb
8330T 235 PTO hp27,060 lb
Median Crawler Tractor23,320 lb
MT743 is in the 77th percentile; 8330T 235 PTO hp is in the 61st · 173 models
MT743 (A)8330T 235 PTO hp (B)Median Crawler Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT743 | John Deere 8330T 235 PTO hp | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | John Deere | — |
| Model | MT743 | 8330T 235 PTO hp | — |
| Category | Crawler, Agricultural | Crawler | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT743 | John Deere 8330T 235 PTO hp | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO Power | John Deere | — |
| Model | AGCO Power 9.8 L | 2240 | — |
| Power Output | 425hp | 280hp | ▲ MT743+145 hp · +52% |
| Rated RPM | 1,700RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ 8330T 235 PTO hp+400 RPM · +24% |
| Cylinders | 7 | 6 | ▲ MT743+1 · +17% |
| Displacement | 599ci | 549ci | ▲ MT743+50 ci · +9% |
| Bore | 4.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 5.7in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT743 | John Deere 8330T 235 PTO hp | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | CVT. Infinitely variable hydrostatic using variable-displacement pump and motors | Powershift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT743 | John Deere 8330T 235 PTO hp | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | 88in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 36,220lb | 27,060lb | ▲ MT743+9,160 lb · +34% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT743 | John Deere 8330T 235 PTO hp | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Load sensing | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Challenger MT743 | John Deere 8330T 235 PTO hp | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Power Rating | 377hp | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT743 | John Deere 8330T 235 PTO hp | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category III/IVN | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 19,000lb | 15,199lb | ▲ MT743+3,801 lb · +25% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT743 | John Deere 8330T 235 PTO hp | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Crawler | Track | — |
| Drive Type | Tracks | Track | — |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT743 | John Deere 8330T 235 PTO hp | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT743 | John Deere 8330T 235 PTO hp | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 200 hpA · 79th percentile (425 hp)B · 62nd percentile (280 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 468 ciA · 66th percentile (599 ci)B · 64th percentile (549 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 97th percentile (7)B · 50th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 23,320 lbA · 77th percentile (36,220 lb)B · 61st percentile (27,060 lb)
A · MT743B · 8330T 235 PTO hpMedian Crawler Tractor