Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive

Challenger MT775E vs Challenger MT835C

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT775E

Four-Wheel Drive

power
374 hp
displacement
599 ci
Cylinders
Not recorded
Forward gears
16
Full MT775E specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT835C

Four-Wheel Drive

power
402 hp
displacement
928 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full MT835C specs
ChallengerChallenger MT775E
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT835C

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive

n = 132–162

Engine Power

▲ MT835C higher · +28 hp (+7%)
MT775E374 hp
MT835C402 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp

MT775E is in the 48th percentile; MT835C is in the 55th · 162 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT835C higher · +329 ci (+55%)
MT775E599 ci
MT835C928 ci
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor826 ci

MT775E is in the 19th percentile; MT835C is in the 84th · 152 models

Forward Gears

= Effectively tied
MT775E16
MT835C16
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor16

MT775E is in the 50th percentile; MT835C is in the 50th · 146 models

Operating Weight

▲ MT835C higher · +16,270 lb (+48%)
MT775E33,730 lb
MT835C50,000 lb
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor37,428 lb

MT775E is in the 40th percentile; MT835C is in the 88th · 132 models

MT775E (A)MT835C (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT775EChallenger MT835CDifference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
ModelMT775EMT835C—
CategoryFour-Wheel DriveFour-Wheel DriveSame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT775EChallenger MT835CDifference
ManufacturerAGCO POWERCaterpillar—
ModelNot recordedC15 ACERT—
Power Output374hp402hp▲ MT835C+28 hp · +7%
Rated RPM1,980RPM2,100RPM▲ MT835C+120 RPM · +6%
CylindersNot recorded6—
Displacement599ci928ci▲ MT835C+329 ci · +55%
Bore4.4in5.4in▲ MT835C+1 in · +23%
Stroke5.7in6.8in▲ MT835C+1.1 in · +19%

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT775EChallenger MT835CDifference
TypeFull power shiftSelective gear fixed ratio with full range operator controlled power shift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT775EChallenger MT835CDifference
LengthNot recorded270in—
WidthNot recorded142in—
HeightNot recorded138in—
Operating Weight33,730lb50,000lb▲ MT835C+16,270 lb · +48%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT775EChallenger MT835CDifference
System TypeNot recordedClosed center pressure-flow compensated—
Steering TypeElectro-Hydraulic Differential SteeringSpeed sensitive differential—

Power Take-off (PTO)

SpecChallenger MT775EChallenger MT835CDifference
Speed 11,000rpmNot recorded—

Tread Width

SpecChallenger MT775EChallenger MT835CDifference
Rear Tread88inNot recorded—
Rear Tread Adjustment88.0" (2235 mm) to 119.5" (3035 mm)Not recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT775EChallenger MT835CDifference
Hitch TypeCategory IVN/IIINot recorded—
Hitch Category3IVN—
Hitch PositionRearRearSame
Hitch Capacity10,000lbNot recorded—

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT775EChallenger MT835CDifference
Steering TypeElectro-Hydraulic Differential SteeringSpeed sensitive differential—
Brake TypeHydraulic Wet DiscWet multiple disc hydraulically actuated—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT775EChallenger MT835CDifference
Battery Voltage12VNot recorded—
Starter TypeElectric StarterElectric, 12 volt—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 375 hp
A · 48th percentile (374 hp)B · 55th percentile (402 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 826 ci
A · 19th percentile (599 ci)B · 84th percentile (928 ci)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 50th percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (16)

Operating Weight

median 37,428 lb
A · 40th percentile (33,730 lb)B · 88th percentile (50,000 lb)
A · MT775EB · MT835CMedian Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT775EFull spec pageChallenger MT835C