Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive

Challenger MT835C vs Challenger MT865B

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT835C

Four-Wheel Drive

power
402 hp
displacement
928 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full MT835C specs
Challenger MT865B Tractor
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT865B

Four-Wheel Drive

power
456 hp
displacement
1,105 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full MT865B specs
ChallengerChallenger MT835C
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT865B

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive

n = 71–162

Engine Power

▲ MT865B higher · +54 hp (+13%)
MT835C402 hp
MT865B456 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp

MT835C is in the 55th percentile; MT865B is in the 67th · 162 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT865B higher · +177 ci (+19%)
MT835C928 ci
MT865B1,105 ci
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor826 ci

MT835C is in the 84th percentile; MT865B is in the 91st · 152 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
MT835C6
MT865B6
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor6

MT835C is in the 50th percentile; MT865B is in the 50th · 159 models

Forward Gears

= Effectively tied
MT835C16
MT865B16
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor16

MT835C is in the 50th percentile; MT865B is in the 50th · 146 models

MT835C (A)MT865B (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT835CChallenger MT865BDifference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
ModelMT835CMT865B—
CategoryFour-Wheel DriveFour-Wheel DriveSame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT835CChallenger MT865BDifference
ManufacturerCaterpillarCaterpillarSame
ModelC15 ACERTC18—
Power Output402hp456hp▲ MT865B+54 hp · +13%
Rated RPM2,100RPM2,099RPM▲ MT835C+1 RPM · <1%
Cylinders66Same
Displacement928ci1,105ci▲ MT865B+177 ci · +19%
Bore5.4in5.7in▲ MT865B+0.3 in · +6%
Stroke6.8in7.2in▲ MT865B+0.4 in · +6%

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT835CChallenger MT865BDifference
TypeSelective gear fixed ratio with full range operator controlled power shiftPowershift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT835CChallenger MT865BDifference
Length270in266in▲ MT835C+4 in · +2%
Width142in141in▲ MT835C+1 in · <1%
Height138in138inSame
Operating Weight50,000lb44,140lb▲ MT835C+5,860 lb · +13%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT835CChallenger MT865BDifference
System TypeClosed center pressure-flow compensatedClosed Center PFC—
Steering TypeSpeed sensitive differentialNot recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT835CChallenger MT865BDifference
Hitch CategoryIVNIII—
Hitch PositionRearNot recorded—

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT835CChallenger MT865BDifference
Steering TypeSpeed sensitive differentialNot recorded—
Brake TypeWet multiple disc hydraulically actuatedNot recorded—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT835CChallenger MT865BDifference
Starter TypeElectric, 12 voltElectric—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 375 hp
A · 55th percentile (402 hp)B · 67th percentile (456 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 826 ci
A · 84th percentile (928 ci)B · 91st percentile (1,105 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 50th percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (16)

Operating Weight

median 37,428 lb
A · 88th percentile (50,000 lb)B · 75th percentile (44,140 lb)
A · MT835CB · MT865BMedian Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT835CFull spec pageChallenger MT865B