Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT855
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 450 hp
- displacement
- 893 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive
Challenger MT855 vs Challenger MT965E
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT965E
Agricultural
- power
- 550 hp
- displacement
- 1,025 ci
- Cylinders
- 12
- Forward gears
- 16
ChallengerChallenger MT855
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT965E
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive
Engine Power
▲ MT965E higher · +100 hp (+22%)MT855450 hp
MT965E550 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp
MT855 is in the 64th percentile; MT965E is in the 85th · 162 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT965E higher · +132 ci (+15%)MT855893 ci
MT965E1,025 ci
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor826 ci
MT855 is in the 69th percentile; MT965E is in the 87th · 152 models
Cylinders
▲ MT965E higher · +6 (+100%)MT8556
MT965E12
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor6
MT855 is in the 50th percentile; MT965E is in the 99th · 159 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedMT85516
MT965E16
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor16
MT855 is in the 50th percentile; MT965E is in the 50th · 146 models
MT855 (A)MT965E (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT855 | Challenger MT965E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | MT855 | MT965E | — |
| Category | Four-Wheel Drive | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT855 | Challenger MT965E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | AGCO Power | — |
| Model | C16 | Turbocharged Diesel | — |
| Power Output | 450hp | 550hp | ▲ MT965E+100 hp · +22% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 1,900RPM | ▲ MT855+200 RPM · +11% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 12 | ▲ MT965E+6 · +100% |
| Displacement | 893ci | 1,025ci | ▲ MT965E+132 ci · +15% |
| Bore | 5.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 6.5in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT855 | Challenger MT965E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Power Shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT855 | Challenger MT965E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 266in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 142in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 139in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 41,000lb | 47,500lb | ▲ MT965E+6,500 lb · +16% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT855 | Challenger MT965E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center load sensing | Closed center pressure-flow compensated | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT855 | Challenger MT965E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | IVN | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT855 | Challenger MT965E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brake Type | Hydraulic wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT855 | Challenger MT965E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 375 hpA · 64th percentile (450 hp)B · 85th percentile (550 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 826 ciA · 69th percentile (893 ci)B · 87th percentile (1,025 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 99th percentile (12)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 50th percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 37,428 lbA · 61st percentile (41,000 lb)B · 84th percentile (47,500 lb)
A · MT855B · MT965EMedian Four-Wheel Drive Tractor