Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive

Challenger MT865C vs Challenger MT975E

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT865C

Four-Wheel Drive

power
534 hp
displacement
1,105 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full MT865C specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT975E

Four-Wheel Drive

power
600 hp
displacement
1,025 ci
Cylinders
12
Forward gears
16
Full MT975E specs
ChallengerChallenger MT865C
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT975E

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive

n = 132–162

Engine Power

▲ MT975E higher · +66 hp (+12%)
MT865C534 hp
MT975E600 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp

MT865C is in the 83rd percentile; MT975E is in the 92nd · 162 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT865C higher · +80 ci (+8%)
MT865C1,105 ci
MT975E1,025 ci
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor826 ci

MT865C is in the 91st percentile; MT975E is in the 87th · 152 models

Cylinders

▲ MT975E higher · +6 (+100%)
MT865C6
MT975E12
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor6

MT865C is in the 50th percentile; MT975E is in the 99th · 159 models

Forward Gears

= Effectively tied
MT865C16
MT975E16
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor16

MT865C is in the 50th percentile; MT975E is in the 50th · 146 models

MT865C (A)MT975E (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT865CChallenger MT975EDifference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
ModelMT865CMT975E—
CategoryFour-Wheel DriveFour-Wheel DriveSame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT865CChallenger MT975EDifference
ManufacturerCaterpillarAGCO Power—
ModelC18 ACERTNot recorded—
Power Output534hp600hp▲ MT975E+66 hp · +12%
Rated RPM2,100RPM1,900RPM▲ MT865C+200 RPM · +11%
Cylinders612▲ MT975E+6 · +100%
Displacement1,105ci1,025ci▲ MT865C+80 ci · +8%
Bore5.7inNot recorded—
Stroke7.2inNot recorded—

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT865CChallenger MT975EDifference
TypeCaterpillar PowershiftPower Shift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT865CChallenger MT975EDifference
Length270inNot recorded—
Width142inNot recorded—
Height138inNot recorded—
Operating Weight43,125lb47,500lb▲ MT975E+4,375 lb · +10%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT865CChallenger MT975EDifference
System TypeClosed center pressure-flow compensatedClosed Center Pressure-Flow CompensatedSame
Steering TypeElectro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheelNot recorded—

Tires

SpecChallenger MT865CChallenger MT975EDifference
Front Tire SizeNot recorded42x27.95—
Rear Tire SizeNot recorded42x27.95—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT865CChallenger MT975EDifference
Hitch CategoryIII/IVNNot recorded—
Hitch PositionRearNot recorded—

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT865CChallenger MT975EDifference
Steering TypeElectro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheelNot recorded—
Brake TypeWet multiple disc hydraulically actuated foot pedalNot recorded—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT865CChallenger MT975EDifference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 375 hp
A · 83rd percentile (534 hp)B · 92nd percentile (600 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 826 ci
A · 91st percentile (1,105 ci)B · 87th percentile (1,025 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 99th percentile (12)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 50th percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (16)

Operating Weight

median 37,428 lb
A · 68th percentile (43,125 lb)B · 84th percentile (47,500 lb)
A · MT865CB · MT975EMedian Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT865CFull spec pageChallenger MT975E