Head to head · Articulated

Challenger MT875C vs Challenger MT975E

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT875C

Articulated

power
586 hp
displacement
1,105 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full MT875C specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT975E

Four-Wheel Drive

power
600 hp
displacement
1,025 ci
Cylinders
12
Forward gears
16
Full MT975E specs
ChallengerChallenger MT875C
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT975E

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Articulated

n = 57–62

Engine Power

▲ MT975E higher · +14 hp (+2%)
MT875C586 hp
MT975E600 hp
Median Articulated Tractor450 hp

MT875C is in the 95th percentile; MT975E is in the 96th · 62 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT875C higher · +80 ci (+8%)
MT875C1,105 ci
MT975E1,025 ci
Median Articulated Tractor827 ci

MT875C is in the 99th percentile; MT975E is in the 91st · 61 models

Cylinders

▲ MT975E higher · +6 (+100%)
MT875C6
MT975E12
Median Articulated Tractor6

MT875C is in the 50th percentile; MT975E is in the 97th · 61 models

Forward Gears

= Effectively tied
MT875C16
MT975E16
Median Articulated Tractor16

MT875C is in the 50th percentile; MT975E is in the 50th · 59 models

MT875C (A)MT975E (B)Median Articulated Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT875CChallenger MT975EDifference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
ModelMT875CMT975E—
CategoryArticulatedFour-Wheel Drive—

Engine

SpecChallenger MT875CChallenger MT975EDifference
ManufacturerCaterpillarAGCO Power—
ModelC18 ACERTNot recorded—
Power Output586hp600hp▲ MT975E+14 hp · +2%
Rated RPM2,100RPM1,900RPM▲ MT875C+200 RPM · +11%
Cylinders612▲ MT975E+6 · +100%
Displacement1,105ci1,025ci▲ MT875C+80 ci · +8%
Bore5.7inNot recorded—
Stroke7.2inNot recorded—

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT875CChallenger MT975EDifference
TypeSelective gear fixed ratio with full range operator-controlled power shiftPower Shift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT875CChallenger MT975EDifference
Length270inNot recorded—
Width142inNot recorded—
Height138inNot recorded—
Operating Weight56,000lb47,500lb▲ MT875C+8,500 lb · +18%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT875CChallenger MT975EDifference
System TypeClosed center pressure-flow compensatedClosed Center Pressure-Flow CompensatedSame
Steering TypeElectro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheelNot recorded—

Tires

SpecChallenger MT875CChallenger MT975EDifference
Front Tire SizeNot recorded42x27.95—
Rear Tire SizeNot recorded42x27.95—

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT875CChallenger MT975EDifference
Steering TypeElectro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheelNot recorded—
Brake TypeWet multiple disc hydraulically actuated foot pedalNot recorded—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT875CChallenger MT975EDifference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 450 hp
A · 95th percentile (586 hp)B · 96th percentile (600 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 827 ci
A · 99th percentile (1,105 ci)B · 91st percentile (1,025 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 97th percentile (12)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 50th percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (16)

Operating Weight

median 51,335 lb
A · 75th percentile (56,000 lb)B · 38th percentile (47,500 lb)
A · MT875CB · MT975EMedian Articulated Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT875CFull spec pageChallenger MT975E