Head to head · Agricultural

Challenger MT875E vs Challenger MT975C

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT875E

Agricultural

power
561 hp
displacement
1,028 ci
Cylinders
12
Forward gears
16
Full MT875E specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT975C

Four-Wheel Drive

power
585 hp
displacement
1,105 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full MT975C specs
ChallengerChallenger MT875E
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT975C

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural

n = 497–1,130

Engine Power

▲ MT975C higher · +24 hp (+4%)
MT875E561 hp
MT975C585 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp

MT875E is in the 99th percentile; MT975C is in the 99th · 1,028 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT975C higher · +77 ci (+7%)
MT875E1,028 ci
MT975C1,105 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci

MT875E is in the 98th percentile; MT975C is in the 99th · 1,083 models

Cylinders

▲ MT875E higher · +6 (+100%)
MT875E12
MT975C6
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5

MT875E is in the 99th percentile; MT975C is in the 74th · 1,130 models

Forward Gears

= Effectively tied
MT875E16
MT975C16
Median Agricultural Tractor16

MT875E is in the 50th percentile; MT975C is in the 50th · 972 models

MT875E (A)MT975C (B)Median Agricultural Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT875EChallenger MT975CDifference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
ModelMT875EMT975C—
CategoryAgriculturalFour-Wheel Drive—

Engine

SpecChallenger MT875EChallenger MT975CDifference
ManufacturerAGCOCaterpillar—
ModelC54854C18 ACERT—
Power Output561hp585hp▲ MT975C+24 hp · +4%
Rated RPM1,500RPM2,100RPM▲ MT975C+600 RPM · +40%
Cylinders126▲ MT875E+6 · +100%
Displacement1,028ci1,105ci▲ MT975C+77 ci · +7%
Bore4.4in5.7in▲ MT975C+1.3 in · +30%
Stroke5.7in7.2in▲ MT975C+1.5 in · +26%

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT875EChallenger MT975CDifference
TypeFull power shiftCaterpillar Powershift, full power shift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT875EChallenger MT975CDifference
LengthNot recorded298in—
Width100in200in▲ MT975C+100 in · +100%
HeightNot recorded151in—
Operating Weight44,265lb50,535lb▲ MT975C+6,270 lb · +14%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT875EChallenger MT975CDifference
System TypeClosed center pressure flow compensatedDirect engine drive—
Pump Flow Capacity58.3gpmNot recorded—
Steering TypePower differentialNot recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT875EChallenger MT975CDifference
Hitch TypeDrawbarNot recorded—
Hitch Category4Not recorded—

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT875EChallenger MT975CDifference
Chassis TypeTrackedNot recorded—
Drive TypeTransmission selective gear fixed ratio with full range operator controlled power shiftNot recorded—
Steering TypePower differentialNot recorded—
Brake TypeWet multiple disc hydraulically actuated by foot pedalNot recorded—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT875EChallenger MT975CDifference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT875EChallenger MT975CDifference
TypeNot recordedCab—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 110 hp
A · 99th percentile (561 hp)B · 99th percentile (585 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 336 ci
A · 98th percentile (1,028 ci)B · 99th percentile (1,105 ci)

Cylinders

median 5.5
A · 99th percentile (12)B · 74th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 50th percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (16)

Operating Weight

median 10,914 lb
A · 99th percentile (44,265 lb)B · 99th percentile (50,535 lb)
A · MT875EB · MT975CMedian Agricultural Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT875EFull spec pageChallenger MT975C