ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT975B
Articulated
- power
- 585 hp
- displacement
- 1,105 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Articulated
Challenger MT975B vs Challenger MT975C
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT975C
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 585 hp
- displacement
- 1,105 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
ChallengerChallenger MT975B
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT975C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Articulated
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedMT975B585 hp
MT975C585 hp
Median Articulated Tractor450 hp
MT975B is in the 93rd percentile; MT975C is in the 93rd · 62 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tiedMT975B1,105 ci
MT975C1,105 ci
Median Articulated Tractor827 ci
MT975B is in the 99th percentile; MT975C is in the 99th · 61 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT975B6
MT975C6
Median Articulated Tractor6
MT975B is in the 50th percentile; MT975C is in the 50th · 61 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedMT975B16
MT975C16
Median Articulated Tractor16
MT975B is in the 50th percentile; MT975C is in the 50th · 59 models
MT975B (A)MT975C (B)Median Articulated Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT975B | Challenger MT975C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | MT975B | MT975C | — |
| Category | Articulated | Four-Wheel Drive | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT975B | Challenger MT975C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Caterpillar | Same |
| Model | C18 | C18 ACERT | — |
| Power Output | 585hp | 585hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 1,105ci | 1,105ci | Same |
| Bore | 5.7in | 5.7in | Same |
| Stroke | 7.2in | 7.2in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT975B | Challenger MT975C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | selective gear fixed ratio with full range operator controlled power shift | Caterpillar Powershift, full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT975B | Challenger MT975C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 298in | 298in | Same |
| Width | 200in | 200in | Same |
| Height | 151in | 151in | Same |
| Operating Weight | 59,820lb | 50,535lb | ▲ MT975B+9,285 lb · +18% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT975B | Challenger MT975C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | closed center PFC | Direct engine drive | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT975B | Challenger MT975C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | IVN/III Opt | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT975B | Challenger MT975C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brake Type | wet multiple disc hydraulically actuated foot pedal | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT975B | Challenger MT975C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT975B | Challenger MT975C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 450 hpA · 93rd percentile (585 hp)B · 93rd percentile (585 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 827 ciA · 99th percentile (1,105 ci)B · 99th percentile (1,105 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 50th percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 51,335 lbA · 96th percentile (59,820 lb)B · 47th percentile (50,535 lb)
A · MT975BB · MT975CMedian Articulated Tractor