Image not recorded
ClaasModel A
Claas CELTIS 456
Agricultural
- power
- 101 hp
- displacement
- 276 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 20
Head to head · Agricultural
Claas CELTIS 456 vs McCormick Intl T105
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl T105
Utility
- power
- 98.6 hp
- displacement
- 269 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
ClaasClaas CELTIS 456
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl T105
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ CELTIS 456 higher · +2.4 hp (+2%)CELTIS 456101 hp
T10598.6 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
CELTIS 456 is in the 46th percentile; T105 is in the 43rd · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ CELTIS 456 higher · +7 ci (+3%)CELTIS 456276 ci
T105269 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
CELTIS 456 is in the 42nd percentile; T105 is in the 39th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedCELTIS 4564
T1054
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
CELTIS 456 is in the 31st percentile; T105 is in the 31st · 1,130 models
Forward Gears
▲ CELTIS 456 higher · +4 (+25%)CELTIS 45620
T10516
Median Agricultural Tractor16
CELTIS 456 is in the 74th percentile; T105 is in the 50th · 972 models
CELTIS 456 (A)T105 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Claas CELTIS 456 | McCormick Intl T105 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Claas | McCormick Intl | — |
| Model | CELTIS 456 | T105 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Claas CELTIS 456 | McCormick Intl T105 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Not recorded | Perkins | — |
| Model | ECE-R24 | 1104D-44T | — |
| Power Output | 101hp | 98.6hp | ▲ CELTIS 456+2.4 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 276ci | 269ci | ▲ CELTIS 456+7 ci · +3% |
| Bore | Not recorded | 4.1in | — |
| Stroke | Not recorded | 5in | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Claas CELTIS 456 | McCormick Intl T105 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | CLAAS | Cerametallic dry disc clutch | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Claas CELTIS 456 | McCormick Intl T105 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 15.3in | 138in | ▲ T105+123 in · +802% |
| Width | 99.6in | 68.9in | ▲ CELTIS 456+30.7 in · +45% |
| Height | 107in | 50.8in | ▲ CELTIS 456+56.2 in · +111% |
| Operating Weight | 10,296lb | 10,340lb | ▲ T105+44 lb · <1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Claas CELTIS 456 | McCormick Intl T105 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic wet clutches | — |
Tires
| Spec | Claas CELTIS 456 | McCormick Intl T105 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 13.6-28 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 16.9-38 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Claas CELTIS 456 | McCormick Intl T105 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Claas CELTIS 456 | McCormick Intl T105 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic wet clutches | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Claas CELTIS 456 | McCormick Intl T105 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Claas CELTIS 456 | McCormick Intl T105 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 46th percentile (101 hp)B · 43rd percentile (98.6 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 42nd percentile (276 ci)B · 39th percentile (269 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 31st percentile (4)B · 31st percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 74th percentile (20)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 46th percentile (10,296 lb)B · 47th percentile (10,340 lb)
A · CELTIS 456B · T105Median Agricultural Tractor