McCormick IntlModel A
McCormick Intl T105
Utility
- power
- 98.6 hp
- displacement
- 269 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
McCormick Intl T105 vs Ursus 1134
Image not recorded
UrsusModel B
Ursus 1134
Agricultural
- power
- 94.5 hp
- displacement
- 278 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl T105
vs
UrsusUrsus 1134
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ T105 higher · +4.1 hp (+4%)T10598.6 hp
113494.5 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
T105 is in the 82nd percentile; 1134 is in the 80th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 1134 higher · +9 ci (+3%)T105269 ci
1134278 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
T105 is in the 77th percentile; 1134 is in the 82nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedT1054
11344
Median Utility Tractor4
T105 is in the 50th percentile; 1134 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedT10516
113416
Median Utility Tractor12
T105 is in the 73rd percentile; 1134 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models
T105 (A)1134 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | McCormick Intl T105 | Ursus 1134 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | McCormick Intl | Ursus | — |
| Model | T105 | 1134 | — |
| Category | Utility | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | McCormick Intl T105 | Ursus 1134 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Perkins | Zetor | — |
| Model | 1104D-44T | Z 8002.12 | — |
| Power Output | 98.6hp | 94.5hp | ▲ T105+4.1 hp · +4% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 269ci | 278ci | ▲ 1134+9 ci · +3% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.3in | ▲ 1134+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5in | 4.7in | ▲ T105+0.3 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | McCormick Intl T105 | Ursus 1134 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cerametallic dry disc clutch | Two-speed power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | McCormick Intl T105 | Ursus 1134 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 138in | 163in | ▲ 1134+25 in · +18% |
| Width | 68.9in | 82.2in | ▲ 1134+13.3 in · +19% |
| Height | 50.8in | 117in | ▲ 1134+66.2 in · +130% |
| Operating Weight | 10,340lb | 10,626lb | ▲ 1134+286 lb · +3% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | McCormick Intl T105 | Ursus 1134 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic wet clutches | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | McCormick Intl T105 | Ursus 1134 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | II | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | McCormick Intl T105 | Ursus 1134 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic wet clutches | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | McCormick Intl T105 | Ursus 1134 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | McCormick Intl T105 | Ursus 1134 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 6.1gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | McCormick Intl T105 | Ursus 1134 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 82nd percentile (98.6 hp)B · 80th percentile (94.5 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 77th percentile (269 ci)B · 82nd percentile (278 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 73rd percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 86th percentile (10,340 lb)B · 87th percentile (10,626 lb)
A · T105B · 1134Median Utility Tractor