McCormick IntlModel A
McCormick Intl T105
Utility
- power
- 98.6 hp
- displacement
- 269 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
McCormick Intl T105 vs Zetor Forterra 95
Image not recorded
ZetorModel B
Zetor Forterra 95
Agricultural
- power
- 97 hp
- displacement
- 254 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 24
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl T105
vs
ZetorZetor Forterra 95
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ T105 higher · +1.6 hp (+2%)T10598.6 hp
Forterra 9597 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
T105 is in the 82nd percentile; Forterra 95 is in the 82nd · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ T105 higher · +15 ci (+6%)T105269 ci
Forterra 95254 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
T105 is in the 77th percentile; Forterra 95 is in the 72nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedT1054
Forterra 954
Median Utility Tractor4
T105 is in the 50th percentile; Forterra 95 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ Forterra 95 higher · +8 (+50%)T10516
Forterra 9524
Median Utility Tractor12
T105 is in the 73rd percentile; Forterra 95 is in the 92nd · 4,941 models
T105 (A)Forterra 95 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | McCormick Intl T105 | Zetor Forterra 95 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | McCormick Intl | Zetor | — |
| Model | T105 | Forterra 95 | — |
| Category | Utility | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | McCormick Intl T105 | Zetor Forterra 95 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Perkins | Zetor | — |
| Model | 1104D-44T | Z 1005 | — |
| Power Output | 98.6hp | 97hp | ▲ T105+1.6 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,200RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 269ci | 254ci | ▲ T105+15 ci · +6% |
| Bore | 4.1in | 4.1in | Same |
| Stroke | 5in | 4.7in | ▲ T105+0.3 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | McCormick Intl T105 | Zetor Forterra 95 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cerametallic dry disc clutch | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | McCormick Intl T105 | Zetor Forterra 95 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 138in | 184in | ▲ Forterra 95+46 in · +33% |
| Width | 68.9in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 50.8in | 111in | ▲ Forterra 95+60.2 in · +119% |
| Operating Weight | 10,340lb | 10,274lb | ▲ T105+66 lb · <1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | McCormick Intl T105 | Zetor Forterra 95 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic wet clutches | Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | McCormick Intl T105 | Zetor Forterra 95 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | McCormick Intl T105 | Zetor Forterra 95 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic wet clutches | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | McCormick Intl T105 | Zetor Forterra 95 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | McCormick Intl T105 | Zetor Forterra 95 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | ROPS | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 82nd percentile (98.6 hp)B · 82nd percentile (97 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 77th percentile (269 ci)B · 72nd percentile (254 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 92nd percentile (24)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 86th percentile (10,340 lb)B · 86th percentile (10,274 lb)
A · T105B · Forterra 95Median Utility Tractor