ClaasModel A
Claas Challenger 65E
Agricultural
- power
- 310 hp
- displacement
- 629 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Agricultural
Claas Challenger 65E vs Claas Xerion 3300 Trac
Image not recorded
ClaasModel B
Claas Xerion 3300 Trac
Agricultural
- power
- 335 hp
- displacement
- 537 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ClaasClaas Challenger 65E
vs
ClaasClaas Xerion 3300 Trac
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ Xerion 3300 Trac higher · +25 hp (+8%)Challenger 65E310 hp
Xerion 3300 Trac335 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
Challenger 65E is in the 94th percentile; Xerion 3300 Trac is in the 96th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Challenger 65E higher · +92 ci (+17%)Challenger 65E629 ci
Xerion 3300 Trac537 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
Challenger 65E is in the 93rd percentile; Xerion 3300 Trac is in the 89th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedChallenger 65E6
Xerion 3300 Trac6
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
Challenger 65E is in the 74th percentile; Xerion 3300 Trac is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ Challenger 65E higher · +11,704 lb (+52%)Challenger 65E34,195 lb
Xerion 3300 Trac22,491 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
Challenger 65E is in the 96th percentile; Xerion 3300 Trac is in the 89th · 971 models
Challenger 65E (A)Xerion 3300 Trac (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Claas Challenger 65E | Claas Xerion 3300 Trac | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Claas | Claas | Same |
| Model | Challenger 65E | Xerion 3300 Trac | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Claas Challenger 65E | Claas Xerion 3300 Trac | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Caterpillar | Same |
| Model | Not recorded | C9 | — |
| Power Output | 310hp | 335hp | ▲ Xerion 3300 Trac+25 hp · +8% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 1,700RPM | ▲ Challenger 65E+400 RPM · +24% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 629ci | 537ci | ▲ Challenger 65E+92 ci · +17% |
| Bore | 4.9in | 4.4in | ▲ Challenger 65E+0.5 in · +11% |
| Stroke | 5.5in | 5.9in | ▲ Xerion 3300 Trac+0.4 in · +7% |
Transmission
| Spec | Claas Challenger 65E | Claas Xerion 3300 Trac | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Claas Challenger 65E | Claas Xerion 3300 Trac | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 261in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 147in | — |
| Operating Weight | 34,195lb | 22,491lb | ▲ Challenger 65E+11,704 lb · +52% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Claas Challenger 65E | Claas Xerion 3300 Trac | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Differential Steering | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Claas Challenger 65E | Claas Xerion 3300 Trac | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III, IV | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Claas Challenger 65E | Claas Xerion 3300 Trac | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Crawler | 4x4 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Crawler Drive | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Differential Steering | Hydrostatic power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Claas Challenger 65E | Claas Xerion 3300 Trac | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Claas Challenger 65E | Claas Xerion 3300 Trac | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 15gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 94th percentile (310 hp)B · 96th percentile (335 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 93rd percentile (629 ci)B · 89th percentile (537 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 96th percentile (34,195 lb)B · 89th percentile (22,491 lb)
A · Challenger 65EB · Xerion 3300 TracMedian Agricultural Tractor