CockshuttModel A
Cockshutt 1250-A
Sub-Compact
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 143 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 6
Head to head · Sub-Compact
Cockshutt 1250-A vs Cockshutt 1355
CockshuttModel B
Cockshutt 1355
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 190 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 8
CockshuttCockshutt 1250-A
vs
CockshuttCockshutt 1355
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Displacement
▲ 1355 higher · +47 ci (+33%)1250-A143 ci
1355190 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
1250-A is in the 81st percentile; 1355 is in the 95th · 757 models
Cylinders
▲ 1355 higher · +1 (+33%)1250-A3
13554
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
1250-A is in the 50th percentile; 1355 is in the 90th · 802 models
Forward Gears
▲ 1355 higher · +2 (+33%)1250-A6
13558
Median Sub-Compact Tractor9
1250-A is in the 18th percentile; 1355 is in the 40th · 616 models
Operating Weight
▲ 1355 higher · +1,290 lb (+41%)1250-A3,120 lb
13554,410 lb
Median Sub-Compact Tractor2,700 lb
1250-A is in the 59th percentile; 1355 is in the 86th · 711 models
1250-A (A)1355 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Cockshutt 1250-A | Cockshutt 1355 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cockshutt | Cockshutt | Same |
| Model | 1250-A | 1355 | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Cockshutt 1250-A | Cockshutt 1355 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Fiat | Fiat | Same |
| Model | Not recorded | 8045 | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | 2,400RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ 1355+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 143ci | 190ci | ▲ 1355+47 ci · +33% |
| Bore | 3.7in | 3.7in | Same |
| Stroke | 4.3in | 4.3in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Cockshutt 1250-A | Cockshutt 1355 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Gear | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Cockshutt 1250-A | Cockshutt 1355 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 122in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 70in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 60.6in | — |
| Operating Weight | 3,120lb | 4,410lb | ▲ 1355+1,290 lb · +41% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Cockshutt 1250-A | Cockshutt 1355 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Cockshutt 1250-A | Cockshutt 1355 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 540 (1.375) | Not recorded | — |
Tread Width
| Spec | Cockshutt 1250-A | Cockshutt 1355 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tread Width | Not recorded | 6in | — |
| Rear Tread | Not recorded | 14.9in | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Cockshutt 1250-A | Cockshutt 1355 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II/I | II/I | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Cockshutt 1250-A | Cockshutt 1355 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Cockshutt 1250-A | Cockshutt 1355 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | Not recorded | 12V | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Cockshutt 1250-A | Cockshutt 1355 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 3.5gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 81st percentile (143 ci)B · 95th percentile (190 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 50th percentile (3)B · 90th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 9A · 18th percentile (6)B · 40th percentile (8)
Operating Weight
median 2,700 lbA · 59th percentile (3,120 lb)B · 86th percentile (4,410 lb)
A · 1250-AB · 1355Median Sub-Compact Tractor