Image not recorded
CockshuttModel A
Cockshutt 2150
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 478 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 6
Head to head · Row Crop
Cockshutt 2150 vs Minneapolis-Moline G1050
Image not recorded
Minneapolis-MolineModel B
Minneapolis-Moline G1050
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 504 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
CockshuttCockshutt 2150
vs
Minneapolis-MolineMinneapolis-Moline G1050
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Row Crop
Engine Displacement
▲ G1050 higher · +26 ci (+5%)2150478 ci
G1050504 ci
Median Row Crop Tractor391 ci
2150 is in the 83rd percentile; G1050 is in the 85th · 1,409 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tied21506
G10506
Median Row Crop Tractor6
2150 is in the 50th percentile; G1050 is in the 50th · 1,417 models
Forward Gears
▲ G1050 higher · +4 (+67%)21506
G105010
Median Row Crop Tractor16
2150 is in the 11th percentile; G1050 is in the 22nd · 1,200 models
Operating Weight
▲ 2150 higher · +2,290 lb (+21%)215012,990 lb
G105010,700 lb
Median Row Crop Tractor12,307 lb
2150 is in the 55th percentile; G1050 is in the 37th · 1,350 models
2150 (A)G1050 (B)Median Row Crop Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Cockshutt 2150 | Minneapolis-Moline G1050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cockshutt | Minneapolis-Moline | — |
| Model | 2150 | G1050 | — |
| Category | Row Crop | Row Crop | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Cockshutt 2150 | Minneapolis-Moline G1050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Oliver-Hercules | Minneapolis-Moline | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 8.3L 6-cyl diesel | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | 1,800RPM | ▲ 2150+600 RPM · +33% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 478ci | 504ci | ▲ G1050+26 ci · +5% |
| Bore | 4.6in | 4.6in | Same |
| Stroke | 3.9in | 5in | ▲ G1050+1.1 in · +28% |
Transmission
| Spec | Cockshutt 2150 | Minneapolis-Moline G1050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Unsynchronized gear | Two-speed power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Cockshutt 2150 | Minneapolis-Moline G1050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 162in | 171in | ▲ G1050+9 in · +6% |
| Width | Not recorded | 94.3in | — |
| Height | 85.5in | 78in | ▲ 2150+7.5 in · +10% |
| Operating Weight | 12,990lb | 10,700lb | ▲ 2150+2,290 lb · +21% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Cockshutt 2150 | Minneapolis-Moline G1050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Cockshutt 2150 | Minneapolis-Moline G1050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Three-Point Hitch | Same |
| Hitch Category | III | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Cockshutt 2150 | Minneapolis-Moline G1050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Power | Power | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Cockshutt 2150 | Minneapolis-Moline G1050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Cockshutt 2150 | Minneapolis-Moline G1050 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 7gal | 8.3gal | ▲ G1050+1.3 gal · +19% |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 391 ciA · 83rd percentile (478 ci)B · 85th percentile (504 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 11th percentile (6)B · 22nd percentile (10)
Operating Weight
median 12,307 lbA · 55th percentile (12,990 lb)B · 37th percentile (10,700 lb)
Length
median 180 inA · 26th percentile (162 in)B · 38th percentile (171 in)
A · 2150B · G1050Median Row Crop Tractor